When Will I Need Math Software in My Studies?

  • Context: Maple 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shelovesmath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maple Software
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Mathematics majors, particularly those in linear algebra, may not require advanced math software like Maple, Mathematica, or MATLAB until they progress to higher-level courses. Pure mathematics typically involves fewer computational tools, while applied mathematics relies more on software for calculations. Sage is highlighted as a free alternative that includes various specialized packages, while Wolfram Alpha serves as a useful tool for homework verification. The discussion emphasizes the need for user-friendly software to aid in writing and checking mathematical proofs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts
  • Familiarity with mathematical proof writing
  • Basic knowledge of computational tools like Wolfram Alpha
  • Awareness of software options such as Maple, Mathematica, and Sage
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the capabilities of Maple and Mathematica for symbolic and numerical calculations
  • Learn how to use Sage and its specialized packages like Singular and Pari/GP
  • Investigate the differences between MATLAB and Octave for numerical studies
  • Research the role of computational tools in pure versus applied mathematics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in the application of software tools in mathematical studies, particularly those transitioning from pure to applied mathematics.

shelovesmath
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Hi all. Ok, so I'm a mathematics major, but I'm only so far as my first linear algebra course right now. I have not had any need to use Maple or Mathematica or Mathlab or a calculator for that matter.

So, I'm curious WHEN I might have to start using these programs (what level math).

Also, is one program better for abstract and one better for applied? I'm not really sure what the pro's and con's are to each program.

I have used the Wolfram Alpha site to check homework answers before. That's about it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that "pure" math folks tend to rarely use these while "applied" math folks tend to use these more. The further you go in "pure" math the more proofs and the fewer tools you seem to use.

If someone could produce an easy to use and very dependable tool that would help students become very skilled at writing proofs in their first proof class and would easily and dependably check more advanced proofs for flaws or possible gaps in reasoning then this might very slowly begin to change the culture in "pure" mathematics. Unfortunately, none of those are easy to use or accepted yet.
 
Last edited:
Hi,

It would be nice to start right now, just like you're doing with Wolfram Alpha.

Maple (or a second choice of mine would be Mathematica) for a mathematician. You can do both symbolic (where x or y or "the parameters" live as they are) or numerical (where all parameters have numerical values) calculations with Maple and Mathematica. MATLAB is mainly for numerical studies, its symbolic engine is not as good as Maple or Mathematica. Sage is also a very nice and free program if you do not want to pay for Maple or Mathematica, there is also a free MATLAB-like program, Octave which is I think very good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
710
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K