When Will We See Results from the Large Hadron Collider's Latest Experiments?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the anticipated results from the Large Hadron Collider's (LHC) latest experiments, including the timeline for public announcements and the implications of potential findings. Participants express curiosity about the operational status of the LHC and the significance of upcoming results in the context of funding and scientific discovery.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants speculate that results may take a few months as the LHC ramps up to full power, with expectations of observing phenomena similar to those seen at Fermi lab, particularly regarding top quarks.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential lack of results in the early years, which could impact funding for the LHC.
  • Several participants question the legitimacy of a website providing countdown information, noting it appears to be a personal site rather than an official CERN resource.
  • There are humorous and speculative comments regarding the consequences of the LHC's experiments, including exaggerated fears about world-ending scenarios.
  • A timeline of potential confirmations for various theories related to the LHC's findings is shared, indicating different expected years for discoveries based on energy scales.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the naming conventions for new forces, suggesting more creative alternatives.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of curiosity and skepticism regarding the timeline and potential outcomes of the LHC's experiments. There is no consensus on when results will be available or what their implications might be, and multiple competing views remain regarding the significance of the findings.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include uncertainty about the timeline for results, the dependence on various theoretical assumptions, and the lack of clear public information from CERN regarding the LHC's operations and findings.

Daniel Y.
http://www.lhcountdown.com/?p=13#comments

The countdown is close to the end! Anyone know when we should expect results of new (or lack of) finds? I mean public announcement. A day? A week? 72 years!?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
From what I understand it will take a few months for the LHC to operate at full power as it is cranked up gradually. During this process we should start seeing what we saw at Fermi lab first, and see more top quarks. After that I have no clue.
 
Daniel Y. said:
http://www.lhcountdown.com/?p=13#comments

The countdown is close to the end! Anyone know when we should expect results of new (or lack of) finds? I mean public announcement. A day? A week? 72 years!?


I hope they get some results in the first years, if they do not funding may dry up.
 
wolram said:
I hope they get some results in the first years, if they do not funding may dry up.

If they don't get any results they still have other things to keep them busy:

http://xkcd.com/401/

:biggrin:
 
g01 said:
if They Don't Get Any Results They Still Have Other Things To Keep Them Busy:

http://xkcd.com/401/

:biggrin:


Lol.
 
Daniel Y. said:
http://www.lhcountdown.com/?p=13#comments

The countdown is close to the end! Anyone know when we should expect results of new (or lack of) finds? I mean public announcement. A day? A week? 72 years!?
Is this site legit? I haven't been able to find public dates for anything, and this site doesn't seem even remotely affiliated with CERN. For all the significance of the LHC, there seems to be a severe lack of public information about what's actually going on, especially this late in the game.
 
CleffedUp said:
Is this site legit? I haven't been able to find public dates for anything, and this site doesn't seem even remotely affiliated with CERN. For all the significance of the LHC, there seems to be a severe lack of public information about what's actually going on, especially this late in the game.
It appears to be someone's personal website.
 
Evo said:
It appears to be someone's personal website.
Yeah, ain't WHOIS grand? ;)
 
CleffedUp said:
Yeah, ain't WHOIS grand? ;)
Were you peeking when I checked WHOIS? :-p
 
  • #10
Evo said:
It appears to be someone's personal website.

Not really sure what it is. I come up with a link to a travel beaches club as their phone number. They are apparently blind proxied through Dreamhost is all I can see.

Not Cern in any event.
 
  • #11
I will celebrate when the Higgs Boson is not found.
 
  • #13
George Jones said:

These two probabilities are pretty much linked aren't they?

"Stable Black Holes That Eat Up the Earth, Destroying All Living Organisms in the Process: 10^-25%.

God: 10^-20%. "


Because surely if we find the first we will find the second as all Earth slips into the event horizon.
 
  • #14
Schematic of proton injection tests at CERN

sector-test-outline-option-3gif.jpg
 
  • #15
Everybody! This thing HAS TO be stopped! It will end the world! No, not by black holes! ANGULAR MOMENTUM! The world will stop spinning and I Love Lucy marathons will never end! The humanity!
 
  • #16
I like that --"No Access Underground during test"-----I wonder if they're thinking something may happen like in the movie --'The Philadelphia Experiment'
 
  • #17
rewebster said:
"No Access Underground during test"-----I wonder if they're thinking something may happen like in the movie --'The Philadelphia Experiment'
The beam line strays into the pipe walls enough to generate some short lived radiation, it takes a few days to 'cool down' after a run.
There is also the risk of asphyxiation from the helium boil off from a magnet quench.
But the biggest risk is fire, there is a lot of wiring/power down there and a fire in a concrete tunnel underground is difficult to fight.

As someone said to me - In case of fire, the sign-in board is just to know whose names to put on the memorial.
 
  • #18
Here is the link to where the image is:
http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/08/11/lhc-test-successful/

Here is an interesting timeline of when confirmations of various theories may be made:

SuperSymmetryMag said:
2009: Supersymmetry–if the appropriate energy scale is 1TeV

2009/2010: Higgs particle–if it is around 200 GeV in mass.

2010/2011: Higgs particle–if it is around 120 GeV in mass. (The lower energy is harder to see because at that energy, it would decay with the key signature involving photons. However, other decays also have similar photons so you need better statistics to tell the difference. A Higgs at higher energy would probably decay primarily into W bosons, with very obvious characteristic jets of particles coming out of the collision.)

2012: Extra dimensions of space–if the energy scale is 9 TeV

2012: Compositeness–if quarks are actually composite particles instead of being fundamental and that composite nature reveals itself on an energy scale of 40 TeV.

2017: Supersymmetry–if the appropriate energy scale is 3 TeV.

2019: Z‘–if there is a new type of force that comes into play around the 6 TeV energy scale. If it does, the particle that communicates the force is represented by the temporary name Z‘ in analogy with the Z that transmits the weak force.
http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/04/14/what-can-we-expect-from-the-lhc/
 
  • #19
W and Z suck. Z' force? Come on. We can come up with better names than that. Like... like... the Dragon Force or something (nothing to do with the crappy band).

Yeah, that's all I got.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K