Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the functionality of multiple detectors for a single F5 tally in the MCNP code, exploring the output behavior and user experience. Participants examine the implications of using multiple detectors versus separate tally numbers, and the limitations of the MCNP manual regarding this feature.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Will questions why only the first F5 detector result appears in the output file, despite the ability to define multiple detectors.
- Some participants suggest that using separate tally numbers (f15, f25, f35) should yield distinct results, while others speculate that multiple points on the same tally may sum to a single answer.
- Alex clarifies that the option to use F15 with multiple detector locations should theoretically provide results as if each detector had a separate tally number.
- One participant notes that the MCNP manuals provide limited guidance on this feature, particularly in the latest version (MCNP 6.3), and mentions that additional results may be found in the .m file with minimal labeling.
- A participant with less experience in MCNP6 discusses the definitions of tally, bin, and detector, and explains the evolution of tally capabilities from MCNP5 to later versions.
- It is noted that unless the 'ND' keyword is used, results for each detector should be visible according to the manual, although there is uncertainty about the behavior of earlier manuals.
- There is a light-hearted comment about the user-friendliness of the code, comparing it to luxury vehicles.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the output behavior of multiple detectors in MCNP, with some believing that results should be visible for each detector while others remain uncertain about the implementation and user experience. No consensus is reached regarding the functionality and clarity of the MCNP manuals.
Contextual Notes
Participants highlight limitations in the MCNP manuals, including a lack of clarity and user-friendly guidance, as well as potential discrepancies between different versions of the manuals and the actual code behavior.