I Where Are the Poles of the Integrand for Δ<0 in Wick Rotation?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter july21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation
july21
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Hi I would like to ask why we can still do Wick rotations even if \Delta<0
it's from Schwartz qft
26BBB60B-67DB-4DAD-8B24-4422F09AEC17.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just think about where the poles of the integrand are for ##\Delta<0##.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top