Where Can I Find Information on the Total Molecular Hamiltonian?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The total molecular Hamiltonian, also known as the Many-Particle Hamiltonian, encompasses both electronic and nuclear contributions, including kinetic energy, attraction to nuclei, and mutual repulsion. The electronic Hamiltonian provided in Atkins' "Physical Chemistry: Quanta, Matter, and Change, 2nd Edition" is a partial representation, lacking the nuclear kinetic energy and spin terms. The Born-Oppenheimer approximation simplifies the Hamiltonian but does not eliminate the kinetic energy term for nuclei, which is essential for understanding molecular vibrations and rotations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly the Schrödinger equation.
  • Familiarity with the Born-Oppenheimer approximation.
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonian mechanics in quantum systems.
  • Basic concepts of molecular vibrations and rotations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Many-Particle Hamiltonian in quantum chemistry.
  • Learn about the Born-Oppenheimer approximation and its applications in molecular dynamics.
  • Explore the role of kinetic energy in molecular vibrations and rotations.
  • Investigate the electronic and nuclear wave functions and their interactions in quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum chemistry, particularly those studying molecular dynamics, Hamiltonian mechanics, and the principles of quantum mechanics applied to molecular systems.

Mayhem
Messages
424
Reaction score
317
Homework Statement
Describe the total molecular Hamiltonian
Relevant Equations
$$\hat{H} = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m_e} \sum^{N_e}_{i=1} \nabla_i^2 -j_0 \sum^{N_e}_{i=1} \sum^{N_n}_{I=1} \frac{Z_I}{r_{Ii}}+\frac{1}{2}j_0 \sum^{N_e}_{i=j}\frac{1}{r_{ij}}$$
Hello.

As an assignment, I have to explain the total molecular Hamiltonian. Problem is, I can't find it anywhere in my book (Atkins, Physical Chemistry: Quanta, Matter, and Change, 2nd Edition), even when I access the index for "Hamiltonian -> polyatomic molecules". They do give the electronic Hamiltonian, which is $$\hat{H} = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m_e} \sum^{N_e}_{i=1} \nabla_i^2 -j_0 \sum^{N_e}_{i=1} \sum^{N_n}_{I=1} \frac{Z_I}{r_{Ii}}+\frac{1}{2}j_0 \sum^{N_e}_{i=j}\frac{1}{r_{ij}}$$

Any pointers? If anyone has the book, and I overlooked something, a page reference would be nice, because I just can't find it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to add the nuclear part plus spin (if needed) and other corrections.
 
dextercioby said:
You have to add the nuclear part plus spin (if needed) and other corrections.
My book gives this definition of the hamiltonian in the context of nuclear spin. Does this look familiar?

1654079423259.png
 
Mayhem said:
My book gives this definition of the hamiltonian in the context of nuclear spin. Does this look familiar?

View attachment 302221
This is not what you are after.

Can you identify the terms in the Hamiltonian you posted?
Mayhem said:
$$\hat{H} = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m_e} \sum^{N_e}_{i=1} \nabla_i^2 -j_0 \sum^{N_e}_{i=1} \sum^{N_n}_{I=1} \frac{Z_I}{r_{Ii}}+\frac{1}{2}j_0 \sum^{N_e}_{i=j}\frac{1}{r_{ij}}$$
 
DrClaude said:
This is not what you are after.

Can you identify the terms in the Hamiltonian you posted?
Yes. From terms left to right on the RHS:

1) describes the kinetic energy of the electrons. To elaborate, this is similar for the kinetic energy of one particle, except here we sum over all electrons (Ne), which each have a corresponding gradient dot product, which gives us the direction the particle is moving in.

2) Attraction to nuclei. Again summing over all electrons in the system, but also particles in the nucleus.

3) Mutual repulsion,
 
Mayhem said:
Yes. From terms left to right on the RHS:

1) describes the kinetic energy of the electrons. To elaborate, this is similar for the kinetic energy of one particle, except here we sum over all electrons (Ne), which each have a corresponding gradient dot product, which gives us the direction the particle is moving in.

2) Attraction to nuclei. Again summing over all electrons in the system, but also particles in the nucleus.

3) Mutual repulsion,
Correct. So what is missing is the equivalent of 1 and 3 for the nuclei.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mayhem
DrClaude said:
Correct. So what is missing is the equivalent of 1 and 3 for the nuclei.
Using the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, wouldn't term 1 just equal 0? i.e. it has no kinetic energy relative to the rest of the system.
 
  • #10
Mayhem said:
Using the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, wouldn't term 1 just equal 0? i.e. it has no kinetic energy relative to the rest of the system.
First, you are looking for the full Hamiltonian, which is independent of of any approximation used to get manageable solutions to the time-independent Schrödinger equation.

Second, no, the kinetic energy term for the nuclei does not go away with the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. This term is where molecular vibrations and rotations will come from.

Writing the full wave function ##\Psi(\{\mathbf{R}\},\{\mathbf{r}\})## (function of the collection of the position of the nuclei and the electrons) as a function of a nuclear and an electronic wave function,
$$
\Psi(\{\mathbf{R}\},\{\mathbf{r}\}) = \psi_\mathrm{N} (\{\mathbf{R}\}) \psi_\mathrm{e} (\{\mathbf{r}\};\{\mathbf{R}\}),
$$
the B-O approx corresponds to neglecting terms in the Hamiltonian where ##\psi_\mathrm{e}## is differentiated with respect to ##\mathbf{R}## and vice versa. But derivatives of ##\psi_\mathrm{N}## with respect to ##\mathbf{R}## remain.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K