Where can I find resources to learn the math behind quantum mechanics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsDad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sources
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding resources to learn the mathematics necessary for understanding quantum mechanics. Participants share recommendations for books and other materials that cover the required mathematical concepts, including calculus, differential equations, and linear algebra, as well as their applications in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a need for resources to understand the math behind quantum mechanics, specifically mentioning wave functions and eigenstates.
  • Another participant recommends several introductory quantum mechanics textbooks, including Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" and Shankar's "Principles of Quantum Mechanics," highlighting their treatment of necessary mathematical concepts.
  • It is suggested that a solid understanding of calculus and differential equations is essential for grasping basic quantum mechanics concepts.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of linear algebra in quantum mechanics, noting that it underpins many fundamental equations.
  • There are differing opinions on the depth of mathematical knowledge required, with some advocating for mathematical methods books while others suggest more rigorous linear algebra texts for deeper understanding.
  • Participants mention specific books like Mary Boas' "Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences" and Axler's linear algebra textbook, discussing their suitability for different levels of understanding.
  • Some participants argue that mathematical methods books serve a necessary purpose in physics, while others contend that they may not provide sufficient depth for a thorough understanding of the underlying mathematics.
  • There is a light-hearted debate about the classification of certain books, such as Simon & Reed and Arfken & Weber, with participants discussing their focus and intended audience.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of calculus, differential equations, and linear algebra for understanding quantum mechanics. However, there is no consensus on the best resources or the level of depth required, leading to multiple competing views on the appropriate materials to use.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the need for specific knowledge levels and the potential for different interpretations of the same resources, indicating that the discussion is influenced by individual backgrounds and learning goals.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for amateur physicists, students, or anyone interested in learning the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics, particularly those seeking recommendations for textbooks and resources.

PhysicsDad
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I am an amateur "physicist" just tinkering and experimenting with my son, and as I read the posts about different concepts, I can get the general idea of what is being explained. However, when it comes to the math (equations for the wave functions, calculating eigenstates, etc.) I am totally lost, and I was wondering if anyone had suggestions on a book or website that I could use to try and understand how to do these calculations. I know algebra and I have taken some calculus, though I haven't used it in years, and I am unfamiliar with a lot of the terms and symbols used in these equations. Any source to help me get a grip on the mathematics would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you mention wavefunctions and eigenstates, I would say that most introductory Quantum Mechanics books include some very good but quick-and-dirty treatments of the requisite math: Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" gives most of the baby-steps in most of its derivations and has a good appendix on linear algebra; Shankar's "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" has a great chapter called "Mathematical Introduction" and some more useful appendices.

But for general physical math references, I would recommend Mary Boas' "Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences" for the stuff that follows right after calculus/differential equations, and for more advanced stuff I'd recommend Arfken's "Mathematial Methods for Physicists."

If you have any specific questions, it might help if you posted them to get an idea of the level you're at--those references are about at the level of a sophomore undergrad who's taken calculus and differential equations.
 
Last edited:
To get started with the most basic concepts in quantum mechanics (e.g. plane waves, the Schrödinger equation in a potential well, and the energy levels of the hydrogen atom) you'll mainly need to know a lot of calculus. The basic integral and differential topics to start, and then eventually on to multivariate calculus (e.g. partial derivatives, volume integrals, curl and divergence). You'll also need a basic understanding of differential equations, since most of the fundamental equations in QM are expressed in terms of them (e.g. the Schrödinger and Dirac equation).

If you want to move further up the ladder, eventually you have to become fairly comfortable with linear algebra. All of QM is really an exercise in linear algebra, although it can be cleverly hidden behind simple calculus for a while, so you can get a ways in before you really have to start worrying about that.

As far as how to learn these topics, textbooks are probably the most straightforward way. I'm not sure what the best books available are for those topics, but all of the stuff I mentioned above is commonplace enough that it should be covered well in just about any textbook, so finding one that's well-reviewed online should be enough. You can also look around online for write-ups or videos (some of those topics probably have videos on the Khan Academy site, although I've never been there so I'm not sure). Finally, if you can get far enough into formulate some concrete questions, you are very welcome to post them here at PF, and someone will be glad to help you with whatever you're stuck on.

Good luck! The math can be pretty daunting at first, but if you work slowly and carefully enough it does all make sense eventually. :smile:
 
It depends on how in-depth a knowledge of the mathematics behind the subject you want. If you want to have just enough knowledge to ostensibly understand the physics then yes the mathematical methods books will work just fine. Otherwise just get a real linear algebra textbook e.g. Axler: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387982582/?tag=pfamazon01-20

The title of the book speaks for itself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WannabeNewton said:
It depends on how in-depth a knowledge of the mathematics behind the subject you want. If you want to have just enough knowledge to ostensibly understand the physics then yes the mathematical methods books will work just fine. Otherwise just get a real linear algebra textbook e.g. Axler: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387982582/?tag=pfamazon01-20

The title of the book speaks for itself.

Well, if you only want a superficial knowledge of the mathematics, then math methods books are good. If you really want to understand why the math is the way it is, and what the pitfalls are, then you need an actual mathematics book.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Math method books are really useful and they serve a very necessary purpose in physics.
 
Jorriss said:
Math method books are really useful and they serve a very necessary purpose in physics.

Sure, a math methods book like Reed & Simon is really useful.
 
micromass said:
Sure, a math methods book like Reed & Simon is really useful.
I would say a book like Simon & Reed is, if anything, a mathematical physics book. It's goal is to teach the underlying math and formalism used in physics.

Arfken & Weber on the other hand is a cook book of how to solve physics problems. It isn't trying to show the structure of math, if it was, it would have to be 10x's as long.
 
Jorriss said:
I would say a book like Simon & Reed is, if anything, a mathematical physics book. It's goal is to teach the underlying math and formalism used in physics.

They call themselves a math method book :biggrin:
 
  • #10
micromass said:
They call themselves a math method book :biggrin:
It says "Methods of Mathematical Physics."

Who knows who won this one.
 
  • #11
Wow, that got a lot of responses real fast. Thanks everyone, I'll start with some of these suggestions and definitely come back for advice if/when I get stuck.

Thanks all
 
  • #12
PhysicsDad said:
Wow, that got a lot of responses real fast. Thanks everyone, I'll start with some of these suggestions and definitely come back for advice if/when I get stuck.

Thanks all
Sorry, it was off topic. Ignore our mentioning simon & reed and arfken & weber.

Boas, math methods is more appropriate if you want a methods book.
 
  • #13
I agree with Chopin, you will be lost in QM without good knowledge of differential equations. Linear algebra is fundamental to QM, and usually a corequisite for introductory QM courses.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
9K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K