Where Did I Go Wrong Calculating the Divergence of \(\widehat{r}/r^{2}\)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of the divergence of the vector field \(\widehat{r}/r^{2}\) and the confusion surrounding the application of Cartesian coordinates. The textbook states that \(\nabla\bullet\left(\widehat{r}/r^{2}\right)=4\pi\delta^{3}\left(r\right)\), but the user struggles to derive the expected result of zero when calculating \(\frac{\partial}{\partial\,x} \frac{x}{(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2})^{3/2}}\). The key error identified is the need to consider all three components of the divergence rather than just the x-component, leading to the conclusion that the terms cancel out to yield zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically divergence and delta functions.
  • Familiarity with Cartesian coordinates and their application in vector fields.
  • Knowledge of the mathematical representation of spherical coordinates.
  • Basic principles of electromagnetic theory related to divergence.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the divergence in spherical coordinates for vector fields.
  • Learn about the properties and applications of the Dirac delta function in physics.
  • Explore advanced topics in vector calculus, including the divergence theorem.
  • Review examples of calculating divergences in various coordinate systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism or fluid dynamics, as well as mathematicians focusing on vector calculus.

shaun_chou
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I know that this question was posted before but I just couldn't get it using another way around. So your comments are highly appreciated. In the textbook, \nabla\bullet\left(\widehat{r}/r^{2}\right)=4\pi\delta^{3}\left(r\right). But when I want to calculate the divergence using Catesian coordinates then it comes to calculate {\frac{\partial}{\partial\,x} x/(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2})^{3/2}} but I can't get the results of "zero" as it claimed. Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to add three derivatives to get zero, not only x-component. You will obtain 1/r3 - 1/r3.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K