Where Did I Go Wrong in Degenerate Perturbation Theory?

mathsisu97
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
For a free particle confined to a ring with radius ##a ## with pertubation ## H' = V_0 \cos(x) ##, what is the first order correct energy and correction to the wavefunction?
Relevant Equations
## H' = V_0 \cos(x) ##
## \psi_n = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} e^{inx} ##
## E_n = \frac{n^2 \hbar^2}{2 m a^2} ##
## n = 0, \pm 1, \pm 2 \ldots ##
$$ W_{n,n} = \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} e^{-inx} V_0 \cos(x) \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} e^{inx} dx $$
$$ = 0 $$

$$ W_{n, -n} = \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} e^{-inx} V_0 \cos(x) \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} e^{-inx} dx $$
$$ = \frac{a n ( \sin(4 \pi n) + i \cos( 4 \pi n) - i )}{\pi (4 n^2 -1) } $$
$$ = 0 $$

This doesn't seem right? Where have I gone wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I basically know nothing about this subject, but fwiw when I tried it I got the first order correction$$\psi_n^{(1)} = \frac{ma^2}{\pi \hbar^2} \sum_{l\neq n} \frac{(n+l)(-i + i)}{n^2 - 2ln + l^2 -1} = 0$$to be zero as well. Perhaps a more experienced member can advise?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
etotheipi said:
I basically know nothing about this subject, but fwiw when I tried it I got the first order correction$$\psi_n^{(1)} = \frac{ma^2}{\pi \hbar^2} \sum_{l\neq m} \frac{(n+l)(-i + i)}{n^2 - 2ln + l^2 -1} = 0$$to be zero as well. Perhaps a more experienced member can advise?
Watch out. Are there integer values of ##l## for which the denominator is zero?
You see that you must be careful with these specific cases. Go back to the integral and consider these two cases separately.
 
nrqed said:
Watch out. Are there integer values of ##l## for which the denominator is zero?
You see that you must be careful with these specific cases. Go back to the integral and consider these two cases separately.

Ah, neat! Yeah, ##l = n \pm 1## both give zero denominator. Considering these separately means doing the integrals of ##e^{\pm ix} \cos{x}## between ##0## and ##2\pi##, each of which gives ##\pi##. So I think, these two terms will be the only two non-zero contributions to the first-order correction.

Does that sound okay to you? I won't write down further details because I'm not the OP, after all :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top