Where Did I Go Wrong? Solving for Angular Momentum in Air Table Puck Collision

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for angular momentum in a collision involving air table pucks. The user expresses uncertainty about a mistake in their calculations related to the center of mass (CoM) and angular momentum equations. They clarify the CoM positions for both pucks and derive the distance from the CoM to puck 1, ultimately calculating it as 0.06 m. Acknowledgment of confusion regarding different reference points for the CoM is noted, leading to a better understanding of the problem. The thread highlights the importance of consistent notation and reference points in physics calculations.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For part(a),
1675366620399.png

The solution is,
1675370648471.png

However, I made a mistake somewhere in my working below and I'm not sure what it is. Does anybody please know? Thank you!

Here is a not too scale diagram at the moment of the collision,
1675366935512.png

## \vec L = \vec r \times \vec p ##
## \vec L = -y_{com}\hat j \times m_1v\hat i ##
## \vec L = y_{com}m_1v\hat k ##
## \vec L = \frac {m_2m_1v(r_1 +r_2)}{m_1 + m_2}\hat k ##
 

Attachments

  • 1675366850583.png
    1675366850583.png
    2.8 KB · Views: 131
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
For part (a) please show what the distance ##y_1## from the CoM to the center of puck 1 is and how you got it in symbolic form.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
kuruman said:
For part (a) please show what the distance ##y_1## from the CoM to the center of puck 1 is and how you got it in symbolic form.
Thank you for your reply @kuruman!

I assume that the COM of each puck is at the geometric center.

Choosing the center of ##m_1## as the origin where ##y = 0## and let ##r_3## be the vertical distance from ## y = 0## to the COM of ##m_2##.

## y_1 = y_{com} = \frac {m_1(0) + m_2r_3} {m_1 + m_2} ##

## y_1 = \frac {m_2(r_1 + r_2)} {m_1 + m_2} ##

Then substituting in values,

## y_1 = \frac {0.12(0.1)} {0.2} ##
## y_1 = 0.06 m ##

Also please see post #1, I missed some of the notations so I have edited it.

Many thanks!
 
Thank you for your help @kuruman! I see now how they got their answer. I think I got confused because the solutions calculated the ##y_{com}## from a different point. Good idea to use ##y_1## notation for calculations of CoM with respect to different origins!Many thanks!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
44K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K