Where Do Emily and Grace's Bumper Cars Collide?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SavageWarrior
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two bumper cars, one moving at a constant speed and the other accelerating, with the goal of determining the collision point relative to one of the cars' starting positions. The subject area includes kinematics and motion equations.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equations of motion for both Emily and Grace, questioning the setup and interpretations of the distance calculations. Some participants suggest alternative formulations of the equations to clarify the relationship between the distances traveled by both cars.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's calculations and interpretations. There is an exploration of how to correctly express the equations to find the collision point, and some guidance has been offered on how to adjust the setup to reflect the desired reference point.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of the problem, including the requirement to express the collision point relative to Emily's starting position and the need to ensure the total distance covered by both cars equals 10 meters.

SavageWarrior
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Emily and Grace are each in a bumper car facing each other 10m apart. Emily moves toward Grace at a constant speed of 2.5 m/s. Grace accelerates toward Emily at a rate of 0.5 m/s^2. Relative to where Emily started, where do the two bumper cars collide?

Homework Equations


x=V_{}0t+1/2at^2
x-x_{}1=V_{}0t+1/2at^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Grace
x=1/2at^2
x=(.5)(.5)t^2
x=.25t^2

Emily
x-10=2.5(t)
(.25t^2)-10=2.5(t)
.25t^2-2.5t-10=0
t=13.06, -3.06

x=.25(-3.06)^2
x=2.34

Can someone tell me if I did this correctly?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at your result. Emily has an initial speed of 2.5 m/s. Grace starts from 0 speed. Your answer implies Grace went a greater distance...
 
I would have written the second equation as 10-x=2.5(t)
 
Well, if you write the second equation that way it doesn't change the answers you will get because you square them.
 
But it is wrong the way you have it written. The ends don't justify the means. You want the sum of the distances moved by both to be 10 m. So you could write:

2.5t + .5at^2 = 10

If you add your two equations, you do not get the above.

The distance 2.34 m is the distance from Grace's original position. Question asks for point of impact from Emily's original position.
 
So, if 2.34 is the distance from Grace wouldn't 10-2.34 be the answer I am looking for?
 
Yes.
 
Okay thanks, but is there a way to set up the problem so that the x calculated is from Emily's position?
 
Sure, take the equation

2.5t + .5at^2 = 10

and solve for t just as before.

Then apply the time to

Xe = Ve * t = 2.5 * t, t=3.06 sec

which gives how far Emily moved from her initial position.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K