Where do gravitational field lines originate from?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter chhitiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lines
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of gravitational field lines, specifically their origin and nature. Participants explore theoretical implications, mathematical representations, and the conceptual understanding of field lines in the context of gravity and other forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if gravitational field lines exist, they must converge into massive bodies, raising the question of where these lines originate.
  • Others argue that mass is the source of gravity, suggesting that field lines emerge from the bodies themselves.
  • There is a contention about the literal interpretation of field lines, with some stating they are merely mathematical constructs that represent the path a point mass would take.
  • Participants discuss the nature of flux lines, noting that they encode the strength of the field and follow an inverse square law in three dimensions.
  • One participant suggests that if flux lines are considered as slopes of a scalar field, they must eventually converge again, leading to a discussion about the universe's geometry.
  • There is a mention of boundary conditions and how field geometries can be described, indicating that the question of where lines end may relate to these conditions.
  • Some participants clarify that magnetic field lines differ from gravitational field lines, with a focus on the visualization of vector fields rather than physical lines.
  • A question arises regarding the concept of "negative mass" and its implications for gravitational field lines.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature and origin of gravitational field lines, with multiple competing views and interpretations remaining throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the implications of an infinite or non-flat universe on the behavior of gravitational field lines, and there are unresolved questions about the conceptualization of field lines in relation to boundary conditions.

chhitiz
Messages
223
Reaction score
0
if we assume the existence of gravitational field lines to be true, it implies that all massive bodies are spheres with field lines converging into them from all directions. this would be true for all planets, stars, even black holes. so, where do these lines come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From the bodies. This is why we say that mass is the source of gravity.
 
but those lines converge into the bodies. what i am asking is where do they emerge from?
 
good point. they have to end somewhere.
 
I think you're taking the concept of field lines too literally. The lines aren't real, they're just the path a point mass would take if it were placed along a field line, neglecting the gravitational attraction the point mass would have on the matter configuration from which the field lines terminates.
 
I think you are taking his question too literally. the lines are mathematical artifacts but they still have to end somewhere.
 
flux lines are not just the path a particle would take. as I'm sure you know, they also encode the strength of the field at each position. they can do this because the field follows an inverse square law (in 3 dimensions).
 
I guess if the flux lines from a planet are thought of as the slope of a scalar field then eventually they must come back together again on the opposite side of the universe.
 
What does "opposite side of the universe" mean?
 
  • #10
as in universe=surface of hypersphere.
 
  • #11
what is a hypersphere? reminds me of the model in a book where universe was the surface of an ever expanding balloon
 
  • #12
Field lines all come from the same source, wether you are talking about gravitational, electrical, or magnetic field lines. That source is your pen (or other graphing implement).
 
  • #13
Defennder is correct. One is taking the notion of "field lines" too literally here. One should always look at the formulation. Look at Coulomb's Law, for example, for a point charge. Can you see "lines" in that formulation? Or what about surfaces? Do you imagine the equipotential surfaces when you look at Coulomb's Law? No? Then why lines? After all, in a Hamiltonian, it is the potential energy form that is of more importance than forces.

What we end up doing in trying to conceptualize the direction of the force on a test charge in such a field is to sketch out such forces (or electric field). This is simply a "scheme" to help us tackle a problem or a visualization. It has nothing to do with ANY physical "lines".

Thus, the question on where "lines" ends really needs to be clarified as how a particular field geometry can be described at a boundary, meaning that this is more of a boundary condition issue than anything else.

Zz.
 
  • #14
what i meant was, if magnetic field lines originate from a positive pole, is it possible for matter to have 'emerging' gravitational field lines?
 
  • #15
I think you mean electric field lines. magnetic field lines are circles around the charges.

there are of course no actual lines. the lines are there just to help us visualize the vector field. if gravity didnt follow an inverse square law then flux lines wouldn't work. we would have to use something else. (actually inverse square works only in 3 dimensions. in 6 dimensions you would need an inverse 5th power law).

I have no idea what you mean by 'emerging'.

flux lines will work for any field that follows an inverse square law in 3 dimensions. that includes gravity.

that assumes an infinite perfectly flat universe. what happens when the universe inst infinite or flat I don't know.
 
  • #16
If I'm not wrong he's asking where does he start drawing say a gravitational field line from the tail arrow to the head. Where do the lines emerge from? I think DaleSpam answered that question already. I don't think there's any place in the universe you could situate 2 masses without them having any gravitational attraction between them, so if you wanted to, you should start drawing at the universe's boundaries.

Unless of course there is such a thing as "negative mass" and I don't mean the semiconductor physics concept.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K