For A, the ball has almost no energy, its all in the pitched.
Same with D, the energy has been dispersed.
For B, the potential energy is in gravitational potential, but it also has some kinetic energy, which is the horizontal component of the ball when it was hit.
For C, the ball again has almost all potential energy, due to the compression of the ball and the movement from the bat. This is also when the ball gets all the energy from the player transferred to it, and this energy will take it to its highest point.
At first I was lead to believe that it was C, due to the fact that as it travels up it will lose energy to the air around it. But then I thought that when the ball is being hit, it still have kinetic energy due to that while in contact with the bat, the bat is moving forward. And people swing those bats pretty fast.
The motion of a bat is upward though, so it had a vertical component of velocity along with horizontal. The velocity at the top is all horizontal, so the vertical component of velocity has been eliminated and thus the ball is moving faster at the bottom; it has more kinetic energy there.So it can be either B or C in my opinion, depending on how you want to interpret the velocity of the ball while it is in contact with the bat, or the energy dispersed as it is climbing to the top of its path.
Did anybody else have any other factors that should be taken into consideration that I missed?