Where does radiation come from?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kjamha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the origins of radiation, particularly electromagnetic radiation, and the mechanisms involved in its generation. Participants explore various contexts including atomic transitions, classical electrodynamics, and nuclear reactions, while also addressing misconceptions and theoretical models.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that electromagnetic radiation can originate from electrons transitioning between energy levels.
  • Others argue that radiation is a broader concept that includes various forms of energy transmission, such as oscillating currents in antennas and nuclear reactions.
  • A participant questions whether radiation from antennas can be considered as electrons jumping between energy levels.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the implications of constant acceleration in cyclotrons and whether this would violate conservation of energy.
  • Some participants discuss the historical context of the Bohr model and its limitations, noting that it does not account for radiation emission as modern quantum mechanics does.
  • There is mention of the complexity of synchrotrons and the challenges in isolating single particles for experiments related to radiation emission.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the mechanisms of radiation generation, with no consensus reached on the specifics of how electromagnetic radiation is produced or the validity of various models discussed.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved questions about the behavior of electrons in circular motion and the implications of relativistic effects on radiation emission. The discussion also highlights the dependence on definitions of radiation and the historical context of atomic models.

kjamha
Messages
98
Reaction score
1
Is it simply the electron jumping from a higher energy state to a lower energy state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Radiation is a broad term, and refers to the transmission of energy through space in the form of waves or particles. Thus, sound is radiation, ocean waves are radiation, etc. Now, when the electron moves to a lower energy level, that is a type of radiation.
 
Thank you. I will clarify - Where does electromagnetic radiation come from? Is it always from electrons jumping from a higher energy level to a lower energy level?

Am I in the correct forum? If not, where should I post my question?
 
Last edited:
Hello kjamha,
according to classical electrodynamics, radiation is present whenever electricity moves with acceleration. For example, oscillating current in antenna rod, or circling electrons in cyclotron produce electromagnetic radiation.
 
Yes, EM waves are not necessarily generated from a transition between discrete energy states. Antennae for example radiate energy from electrons sloshing around in a conductor.

Claude.
 
EM is also emitted during most nuclear reactions (fission, fusion, or decay).
 
I completely forgot about decay - thanks!. As far as the antenna is concerned, wouldn't that be an example of electrons jumping from a higher to a lower energy level?

Also, the cyclotron example is very interesting. If you can get an isolated electron to travel in a circular pattern at a constant speed (for example, an electron over a magnetic plate), would the electron, which is now moving at a constant acceleration, emit radiation of a particular wavelength forever? How does this not violate conservation of energy?
 
It would violate conservation of energy. This was one of the fundamental puzzles of Bohr's model of the atom.

In cyclotrons, electrons that emit radiation loose energy. That is the major reason why the LHC has to be so big, to make the radius large and the acceleration small.
 
I thought the Bohr model was dead - and electrons exist in a probability cloud. The electron does not rotate around the nucleus, but exists everywhere at the same time.
or are you saying that the rotating electron somehow exists in some energy level (or shell)?
 
  • #10
It is dead. But at the time people thought point-charge electrons were flying in circles around the nucleus. If the electrons did that, they woud have to emit radiation - which they don't. The Schödinger equation with wave functions as probability clouds solved that problem.
 
  • #11
a fluctuation in vacuum space!
 
  • #12
The Schödinger equation with wave functions as probability clouds solved that problem.

This is true only partially. The atom described by Schrödinger's equation does not radiate for the same reason Bohr's atom does not radiate - the relativity and the radiation is neglected right from the beginning. What happens in fully relativistic theory is hard to say; there is no exact solution of hydrogen in QFT.

If you can get an isolated electron to travel in a circular pattern at a constant speed (for example, an electron over a magnetic plate), would the electron, which is now moving at a constant acceleration, emit radiation of a particular wavelength forever?

This is still not ruled out. In fact in cyclotron or other accelerators they do not have one isolated particle, but always a bunch of particles (something like tens of billions or so). As far as I know, such experiment with one particle was never done.
 
  • #13
Synchrotrons are very complicated machines with lots of magnets for focusing (like charges repel each other) and "bending", and radio-frequency cavities to (re)accelerate the stored particles.

A Rydberg atom may be a better approximation of what you are looking for

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rydberg_atom
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K