Where is my mistake in this probability problem?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a probability problem involving a bag containing blue and red balls. The original poster is attempting to calculate the conditional probability of selecting two red balls given that the second ball selected is red, while also exploring the implications of independence between events.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster uses the conditional probability formula but expresses confusion about the logic leading to an incorrect answer. They question the independence of events related to the selection of red balls.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaged in clarifying the relationship between the events of selecting red balls and the implications of independence. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the events and the application of probability formulas, but no consensus has been reached on the original poster's confusion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the original poster's reliance on textbook definitions of independence, while also noting that the events in question are dependent. There is an emphasis on the need for careful consideration of the problem setup and the relationships between events.

synkk
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
Bag contains 9 blue balls, 3 red balls.
A ball is selected at random, colour recorded and NOT replaced.
A second ball is selected at random, colour recorded.

a) Draw tree diagram (no problem).

Part 2

a) Find probability second ball is red (no problem, 0.25)

b) Find probability both balls selected are red, given that the second ball is red.

I'm having a problem understanding where my logic is wrong.

Using the formula:

P(B|A) = P(B and A) / P(A)

or

P(both balls are red | second ball is red) = P(both balls are red and second ball is red) / P(second ball is red)

P(second ball is red) = (1/4) or 0.25 (from part a)

P(both balls are red) = (3/12) * (2/11) = (1/22)

Because I need to find:

P(both balls are red and second ball is red)

I do the following to get the intersection

(1/4) * (1/22) = (1/88)

and then divide it by P(second balls is read) to reduce the sample space down to the given event. However this leads to the wrong answer.

Looking at the mark scheme, the just do (3/12) * (2/11) to get the intersection, but following the formula leads me to a different answer.

Looking at the textbook it says that if two events are independent then P(A|B) = P(A), if so then these two events are not independent, and the mark scheme is treating it as if they were independent.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
synkk said:
Bag contains 9 blue balls, 3 red balls.
A ball is selected at random, colour recorded and NOT replaced.
A second ball is selected at random, colour recorded.

a) Draw tree diagram (no problem).

Part 2

a) Find probability second ball is red (no problem, 0.25)

b) Find probability both balls selected are red, given that the second ball is red.

I'm having a problem understanding where my logic is wrong.

Using the formula:

P(B|A) = P(B and A) / P(A)

or

P(both balls are red | second ball is red) = P(both balls are red and second ball is red) / P(second ball is red)

P(second ball is red) = (1/4) or 0.25 (from part a)

P(both balls are red) = (3/12) * (2/11) = (1/22)

Because I need to find:

P(both balls are red and second ball is red)

I do the following to get the intersection

(1/4) * (1/22) = (1/88)

and then divide it by P(second balls is read) to reduce the sample space down to the given event. However this leads to the wrong answer.

Looking at the mark scheme, the just do (3/12) * (2/11) to get the intersection, but following the formula leads me to a different answer.

Looking at the textbook it says that if two events are independent then P(A|B) = P(A), if so then these two events are not independent, and the mark scheme is treating it as if they were independent.

{both are red and second is red} = {both are red} (saying the second is red does not change anything).

RGV
 
Last edited:
Ray Vickson said:
{both are red and second is red} = {both are red} (saying the second is red does not change anything).

RGV

So they are independent?
 
synkk said:
So they are independent?

If by "they" you mean the two events {both are red} and {second is red} then NO, they are not independent (one of them is contained in the other). However, that does not matter at all.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
If by "they" you mean the two events {both are red} and {second is red} then NO, they are not independent (one of them is contained in the other). However, that does not matter at all.

RGV

By they I mean the events that red or blue is picked. How does it not matter at all? It says on my book here that if two events are independent then P(A|B) = P(A), which is essentially what is going on here, but they are dependent, which is what's confusing me.
 
synkk said:
By they I mean the events that red or blue is picked. How does it not matter at all? It says on my book here that if two events are independent then P(A|B) = P(A), which is essentially what is going on here, but they are dependent, which is what's confusing me.

All the events in your first posting involved only red balls, not blue ones. Of course, either a red one or a blue one is picked: nothing else can possibly happen! However, that is not the issue. You originally said you wanted P{both are red and second is red}, and you claimed to be confused about having to compute P{A & B} for A and B possibly not independent; in the context of your post you were taking A = {both are red} and B = {second is red}. Again, I repeat: they are dependent, but it does not matter. Maybe you are just trying to apply some formulas without thinking; I suggest you look more carefully at the situation.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
All the events in your first posting involved only red balls, not blue ones. Of course, either a red one or a blue one is picked: nothing else can possibly happen! However, that is not the issue. You originally said you wanted P{both are red and second is red}, and you claimed to be confused about having to compute P{A & B} for A and B possibly not independent; in the context of your post you were taking A = {both are red} and B = {second is red}. Again, I repeat: they are dependent, but it does not matter. Maybe you are just trying to apply some formulas without thinking; I suggest you look more carefully at the situation.

RGV

thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K