Where is the Center of SHM in a Light Elastic String System?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a light elastic string with a mass attached, exploring the dynamics of simple harmonic motion (SHM) as the mass is projected upwards. The original poster questions the location of the center of SHM, particularly in relation to the forces acting on the mass and the equilibrium position.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand why the center of SHM is stated to be at point 'O' despite the absence of equilibrium at that point. They express confusion regarding the forces acting on the mass and where the center of SHM should logically be located.
  • Some participants provide mathematical formulations and suggest that the center of motion can be derived from the equations of motion, while others question the calculations and dimensions involved in the equations.
  • There is a discussion about the distinction between the upward and downward motions of the mass and whether SHM can be considered in both scenarios.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various interpretations of the problem, with participants offering different mathematical approaches and questioning assumptions about the forces involved. Some guidance has been provided regarding the equations of motion, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct interpretation or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, including potential errors in calculations and the implications of different motion phases. There is an acknowledgment of the need to clarify the definitions and assumptions related to SHM in this specific context.

shalikadm
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


One end of a light elastic string having a natural length of 'a' and elastic modulus 'mg' is attached to 'm' mass and the other end to point 'O'. Then the mass is projected upwards.Where is the center of SHM?

2u4hic8.jpg


Homework Equations



ω=angular velocity
F=ma
from Hooke's law,
T=λx/l
T=tension of the string
λ=elastic modulus
l=natural length
x=extention

The Attempt at a Solution


15zni1l.jpg

2pq6glg.jpg


There's no any equilibrium in the motion above point 'O' as T and mg are towards the same direction.But after point 'A' I think that there's a SHM as the string is extended.In the calculation, it says that center of SHM is at point 'O'..How can it be true ?...No equilibrium there !...It must be somewhere under that point 'O' where the two forces on the mass are opposing each other..Or where have I got it wrong ?
thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this question has been posted in the wrong board - it belongs in the Physics section.
 
No, as stated this is a math problem. Taking x= 0 at point O, where x is the position of the weight, positive downward, the total force on the weight mg and [itex]-\lambda(x- a)[/itex]. The position at time t is given by [itex]d^2x/dt^2= mg- \lambda(x- a)[/itex]. If [itex]\lambda[/itex] happens to be equal to mg, this is [itex]d^2x/dt^2= mg((1+a)- x)[/itex] or [itex]d^2x/dt^2+ mgx= (1+a)mg[/itex].

The general solution to that equation is
[tex]x(t)= Ccos(\sqrt{mg}t)+ Dsin(\sqrt{mg}t)+ 1+ a[/tex]

You can find the max and min of that and then the center of motion will be 1/2 of those.
 
I think that there are some mistakes in your calculation...
the total force on the weight mg and −λ(x−a)
It must be mg and -λ(x-a)/a...[see also that λ's dimensions is kgms-2..so (x-a)/a must have no dimensions]
The position at time t is given by [itex]d^2x/dt^2= mg- \lambda(x- a)[/itex]
[itex]d^2x/dt^2[/itex] is an acceleration...So the right side of the equation it must be
[itex]d^2x/dt^2=g- \lambda(x- a)/a[/itex](as the dimensions of g and λ(x-a)/a must be ms-2)
and so..[itex]d^2x/dt^2= mg(2a- x)[/itex]
and so the general solution must be something like this...
[tex]x(t)= Ccos(\sqrt{g/a}t)+ Dsin(\sqrt{g/a}t)+ 2a[/tex]
Any way
we don't need to find general solution...we can find the center of motion from [itex]d^2x/dt^2=o[/itex]..so its [itex]x=2a[/itex]
You have considered the downside of the motion..I want to consider the upside motion..Is there an SHM in the upside motion...Can't we use equations to the upside motion(after it goes higher than A)..Is there something wrong in my first calculation..this problem is haert burning...thanks in advance..!
 
sorry for bump
 
I'm not sure what you mean by the "downside". The solution you give is for the weight moving both up and down. Take the derivative with respect to t, set it equal to 0 and solve for t. Those values of t will give the max and min values. The average value is half way between the max and min.

You could also do this by using trig identities to write [itex]Ccos(\theta)+ Dsin(\theta)+ 2a[/itex] as [itex]A sin(\phi)+ 2a[/itex] and the central point will be obvious.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I'm not sure what you mean by the "downside".
What I meant by upside and downside is motion above 'O' and motion below 'o'..
Note:the mass is projected upwards first.then it travels under gravity.then the string extends(pass 'A').so travels up in SHM..and down in SHM..then the string gets to its natural length...so engage in a free fall...then it passes 'o' under gravity...the string extends again after its natural length in the downward motion..so engage in SHM again..travels down in SHM...and up in SHM again..am I correct ?
When we find the center of SHM of a mass projected downwards,we get its equilibrium position (where T=mg) as the center...But when projected upward,I get something that doesn't true-center of SHM at 'O' where it's under a net force (gravity)..
What would u say about my calculation in the images above?Are they correct.?
 
solved
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K