Where is this equation derived from? (general physics)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the equation v = w√(A² - x²), which appears to relate to concepts in simple harmonic motion (SHM) and possibly rotational motion. Participants explore the relationships between variables such as velocity, angular velocity, amplitude, and position.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest defining terms to clarify the meanings of v, w, A, and x. There are discussions about the context of the equation, including its relation to rotational motion and SHM. Some participants propose using conservation of energy as a method for deriving the equation, while others explore the geometric interpretation of SHM in relation to circular motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various insights and approaches to understanding the equation. There is recognition of the need for clarity in definitions and an exploration of different derivation methods, including energy conservation and geometric interpretations. No explicit consensus has been reached, but several productive lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the equation may not need to be memorized but can be derived from known principles. There is an emphasis on understanding the underlying physics rather than simply recalling formulas.

PCSL
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Hey, I was wondering what equations the following equation is derived from:

v=w√(A2-x2)

I figure v=wA is one of them but I'm not sure how A2=A-x

Thanks.

edit: The only reason I don't think this is an equation I have to memorize, but one that I can build from equations I already have memorized.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you'll have some more luck on the forum if you defined your terms. v, w, A and x can mean many different things in physics.
 
e.bar.goum said:
I think you'll have some more luck on the forum if you defined your terms. v, w, A and x can mean many different things in physics.

velocity, angular velocity, amplitude, distance
 
Well, in rotational motion, v =r*ω. Perhaps it is for a situation where that square root gives you the radius.

Oh, you say A is amplitude. So it must be something to do with a wave or periodic motion.

In physics we are mostly in the business of studying a situation, then finding the formula that describes it.
 
PCSL said:
velocity, angular velocity, amplitude, distance

Assuming that you're talking about simple harmonic motion in the x-direction with angular frequency (not angular velocity) ω such that the x position vs. time is given by the equation

x = Acos(ωt)

then the velocity in the x-direction vs. time is given by (and you just have to accept this for now):

v = -ωAsin(ωt)

Now, ask yourself, what is x2 + v2 equal to? Can you see how to simplify this using a special property of sine and cosine? Hint: it helps if you modify the v term by dividing out a certain factor first. The end result should be the equation that you're trying to derive.
 
I screwed up the equation for the velocity in my previous post and have since edited it.
 
I also just realized that, for SHM of a horizontal spring, in particular, there is a much easier way of deriving this using the conservation of energy. It doesn't require you to know the explicit time-dependence of the variables (i.e. you don't need to know the expressions for x and v vs. time using this method).
 
so using conservation of energy .5kA^2=.5mv^2

v=√(A^2k/m)
w^2=k/m

v=√(w^2A^2)

That yields v=wA...

I'd appreciate a little more help.

Nevermind, using .5mv^2+.5kx^2=.5kA^2 works.

Thanks.
 
If you watch a bouncing spring (that has the same behavior when stretching and compressing) you will notice that it stops where x = A and is going the maximum speed where x = zero and your original formula is consistent with this, so this may help you remember it.. Turn circular motion on its edge and you have the bouncing spring situation so your angular velocity relation to linear veloctiy holds as do the energy equations.
 
  • #10
If you want to see where the trig expression in SHM come from you should consider the circular motion that can be associated with every SHM.
The attached sketch shows a point P moving in circular motion with constant
angular velocity ω.
The point N is the projection of P onto a diameter and N executes SHM. In the sketch the SHM displacement is x.
All of the SHM equations can be derived from the circular motion equations and, more importantly, can be 'seen'
I hope you can see that the SHM velocity is the 'horizontal' component of the circular motion velocity = VSin∅ ... Sin∅ = d/r (d has no meaning for the SHM).
I hope that this geometry helps to see where SHM equations come from !
SHM is circular motion viewed edge on... just as netgypsy observes.
 

Attachments

  • SHM.jpg
    SHM.jpg
    38.7 KB · Views: 494
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K