Where to find fixed power supplies of: -9V, +9V, and/or -5V

  • Thread starter Thread starter atlbraves49
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the availability and suitability of fixed power supplies providing -9V, +9V, and/or -5V outputs. Participants explore various applications, including powering specific circuits and the potential use of bench power supplies versus batteries.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the specific application for the power supplies, questioning whether bench supplies or batteries are needed.
  • One participant suggests using bench top power supplies, mentioning options available from Radio Shack and Agilent.
  • Another participant proposes using 9V batteries with snap-on leads, but raises concerns about the circuit design and the specifications of the MCP6001 op-amp.
  • There are discussions about the adequacy of a specific power supply linked in the thread, with varying opinions on its suitability for analog work.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the circuit schematic provided, questioning the appropriateness of the specified voltage supplies for the MCP6001.
  • Participants discuss the implications of a fan in the power supply, with some suggesting it indicates better performance for analog applications due to temperature regulation.
  • There are humorous exchanges about the nature of engineers and the weight of components in the power supply, with references to quiz questions related to power supply design.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best solution for power supplies, with multiple competing views on the use of bench supplies versus batteries and the validity of the circuit schematic. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the adequacy of the proposed power supply and the specifications of the op-amp.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the specifications of the MCP6001 op-amp and the implications of using different voltage supplies. Participants express uncertainty about the circuit design and the reliability of the provided schematic.

atlbraves49
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Does anyone even make fixed power supplies of these values? I haven't been able to find any so far.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What's the application? Do you need bench supplies or something to supply power to a product? Should the +/- supplies be dual tracking? Should it take power from the AC lines?

What are your current requirements?
 
Phrak said:
What's the application? Do you need bench supplies or something to supply power to a product? Should the +/- supplies be dual tracking? Should it take power from the AC lines?

What are your current requirements?

They would be used to power this circuit:

http://www.tekscan.com/images/flexi-circuit-new.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would just use some bench top power supply. You can get cheap ones from radio shack or expensive ones from Agilent.
 
I'd use a couple 9 volt batteries. Buy the little snap on leads at radio shack. Apparently, that's why the drawing shows the op amp biased by +/-9V, which is not otherwise a common practice.

Except for the fact that I took a look at the MCP6001 datasheet. It takes a single ended 5.5V maximum supply.

There's something fishy about your drawing. It calls a feedback resistor a 'reference resistor'. This is enough to discard it as completely suspect, if you pulled it off a web page somewhere.
 
Last edited:
Corneo said:
I would just use some bench top power supply. You can get cheap ones from radio shack or expensive ones from Agilent.

I second this suggestion (especially given your other thread). Unless you're trying to put this into production or semi-independent prototype, at which point, you might consider getting three regulators: two switching ones to regulate to +9 and -9, and then a linear one to do from -9V to -5V (e.g. LM7905)

But I'd still use the bench power supply to prototype and ensure that it works. Learning how to (properly) use a bench power supply is an essential skill for an EE, especially an electronics-oriented one. It's also a skill they don't always teach you (or teach you very well in your early years)
Phrak said:
I'd use a couple 9 volt batteries. Buy the little snap on leads at radio shack. Apparently, that's why the drawing shows the op amp biased by +/-9V, which is not otherwise a common practice.

Except for the fact that I took a look at the MCP6001 datasheet. It takes a single ended 5.5V maximum supply.

There's something fishy about your drawing. It calls a feedback resistor a 'reference resistor'. This is enough to discard it as completely suspect, if you pulled it off a web page somewhere.

I saw something similar used in a circuit once. The gain equation is -Rf/Rs but since pressure is proportional to the conductance of the sensor (1/Rs), the output voltage (in this configuration) is directly proportional to the pressure on the sensor and Rf acts as a scaling factor (depending on your expected operating pressure range). Don't remember how great it worked out for them, though.
 
Last edited:
k bench top power supply it is (and batteries won't work, I was told by the flexi force engineer).

I know some of you have seen this, but is this power supply adequate, and are there any less expensive ones available?

http://salestores.com/pr30trouposu2.html
 
Seems pretty decent.
 
That's pretty decent. Specs and features look pretty good, though I'm not familiar with the brand. You can try eBay, but that might be hit or miss. Doesn't your school have something like this?
 
  • #10
"The engineer said..." And I say nonsense. Engineers grow on trees. Wait, they swing in trees. No, nevermind. :smile:

The MPC6001 is a 1.8 to 5.5V device. And the circuit WILL work with +/-4.5 volts from 6 AA batteries. 4.5 volts for the op amp. -4.5V for the reference (the real reference, called V_T). 18 volts will fry it.

Good grief, go buy a $350 bench supply instead.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
i would ask where they get their op-amps from. sometimes when one company makes "drop-in replacements" to compete with other brands, the actual product may be quite different.
 
  • #12
atlbraves49 said:
k bench top power supply it is (and batteries won't work, I was told by the flexi force engineer).

I know some of you have seen this, but is this power supply adequate, and are there any less expensive ones available?

http://salestores.com/pr30trouposu2.html

Yabba-Dabba-Doo! That's the first time I've seen bikini models selling power supplies. Yeowza!

What were we talking about again?... Oh yeah. That power supply looks good for analog work, for one important reason.

Quiz Question -- why would them saying it has a fan make me think this supply would be good for analog work? (Well, that plus the physical size for the powers listed...)
 
  • #13
Does the fan regulate the internal temperature within the power supply. Hence the instrument is less prone to temperature drift?
 
  • #14
Corneo said:
Does the fan regulate the internal temperature within the power supply. Hence the instrument is less prone to temperature drift?

Not that. Look at the weight of the supply...
 
  • #15
Hmm perhaps another clue? Based on what I've seen in the past, it seems the fan is to control the ambient temperature within the instrument. Which could fluctuate as much as 30 degrees inside as compared to outside the casing.

BTW: Have you checked your inbox?
 
  • #16
what do you think would be the heaviest thing in the box?
 
  • #17
I would think its the transformer coils.
 
  • #18
and what sort of DC supply design would use heavy transformers?
 
  • #19
Corneo said:
Hmm perhaps another clue? Based on what I've seen in the past, it seems the fan is to control the ambient temperature within the instrument. Which could fluctuate as much as 30 degrees inside as compared to outside the casing.

BTW: Have you checked your inbox?

Only hate mail :biggrin:

Proton Soup said:
what do you think would be the heaviest thing in the box?

Good Quiz Question clue, Proton...
 
  • #20
I meant your inbox for this forum.

I'll have to think about this one for a bit.
 
  • #21
Corneo said:
I meant your inbox for this forum.

No new PMs.
 
  • #22
Proton Soup said:
what do you think would be the heaviest thing in the box?

The accumulated dust from running the fan, of course. :rolleyes:
 
  • #23
atlbraves49 said:
They would be used to power this circuit:

http://www.tekscan.com/images/flexi-circuit-new.jpg
[/URL]

What are you going to drive with Vout? The min/max of Vout will be set by the rail voltages you use (VDD-VSS). They can always be lower than the maximum rating of an op amp, an analog device, at the cost of lowerin the max swing of Vout. So you can also use, say, +/-5 to power the op amp, which is a fixed power supply that is commonly available.

And as above I question the given +/-9 supplies in that schematic for the MCP 6001. This data sheet shows VDD-VSS=7v, so +/-9 will blow it for sure, -/+5 may too.
http://pdf1.alldatasheet.com/datasheet-pdf/view/74937/MICROCHIP/MCP6001.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #24
berkeman said:
Quiz Question -- why would them saying it has a fan make me think this supply would be good for analog work? (Well, that plus the physical size for the powers listed...)

QQ Answer -- And the weight thing. It's a linear power supply, based on its weight for power output, and a linear power supply has no output noise versus a switching PS. Analog circuits do not generally tolerate PS noise all that well.
 
  • #25
berkeman said:
QQ Answer -- And the weight thing. It's a linear power supply, based on its weight for power output, and a linear power supply has no output noise versus a switching PS. Analog circuits do not generally tolerate PS noise all that well.

Fowl, I say! An expert level question. But, perhaps posting a quiz question like this one could be interesting on occasion, whenever you run across one on the job...
 
  • #26
Phrak said:
Fowl, I say!

LOL. You calling me chicken? :smile:
 
  • #27
Phrak said:
Fowl, I say! An expert level question. But, perhaps posting a quiz question like this one could be interesting on occasion, whenever you run across one on the job...

maybe not the weight, but the topic was mentioned here recently
 
  • #28
mheslep said:
And as above I question the given +/-9 supplies in that schematic for the MCP 6001. This data sheet shows VDD-VSS=7v, so +/-9 will blow it for sure, -/+5 may too.

7Volts is the absolute maxium rating.


Inline quiz question. :biggrin:

What is the difference between absolute maxium rating (usually listed at the beginning of a data sheet) and...well, just the plain maxiumum?
 
  • #29
Phrak said:
7Volts is the absolute maxium rating.


Inline quiz question. :biggrin:

What is the difference between absolute maxium rating (usually listed at the beginning of a data sheet) and...well, just the plain maxiumum?

The Absolute Max numbers at the start are usually the damage levels. The maximums in the Typical Operating Conditions part of the datasheet are the rated specifications that you should design to.
 
  • #30
Phrak said:
7Volts is the absolute maxium rating.
For the version we've found online apparently, but perhaps there's an upgraded part suggested by this sensor mfn? Certainly +/-9 is not extreme for CMOS op amps in general.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K