Where to learn the matrix formulation of QM

  • Thread starter Thread starter Superposed_Cat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Qm
Click For Summary
Resources for learning the matrix formulation of quantum mechanics include Wikipedia's bra-ket notation and Caltech's lecture notes, specifically Chapter 2. In quantum mechanics, a vector in a finite-dimensional space is represented as a column vector, while the position space wavefunction can be viewed as a vector in an infinite-dimensional space. Understanding the differences between finite and infinite dimensions is crucial, but starting with finite dimensions can provide useful intuition. Operators acting on these states can be represented as matrices, with the Hamiltonian being a key example. Claude Cohen-Tannoudji's "Quantum Mechanics" is recommended for further study.
Superposed_Cat
Messages
388
Reaction score
5
Hi, material on learning the calculus way are plentiful but I can't find anywhere to teach me the matrix way, any links? I can't even find out how to represent the Hamiltonian as a matrix. Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/preskill/ph229/#lecture (Chapter 2)

Take a look also at the third volume of the Feynman lectures.

In a given basis, a vector has a representation as a column vector vi, where i is a discrete index. The number of indices is the dimension of the vector space. You can think of the position space wavefunction ψ(x) similarly as the representation of a vector in the position basis, except that the index x is continuous. Since there are now an infinite number of indices, the dimension of the vector space is infinite. There are differences between finite and infinite dimensional vector spaces, but using the finite dimensional case for intuition is roughly ok. Now sticking to the finite dimensional case, if we think of the state as a column vector in a certain basis, an operator on the state can be represented as a matrix.

For an example of the practical use of the Hamiltonian as a matrix try http://condensedconcepts.blogspot.sg/2013/10/tutorial-on-effective-hamiltonians-for.html
 
Last edited:
I found most helpful the Quantum Mechanics by Claude Cohen-Tannoudji
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
787
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
9K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K