Which Advanced Mathematical Physics Books Should I Read?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding a suitable advanced mathematics book for understanding quantum mechanics and general relativity. Participants recommend "A Course in Modern Mathematical Physics: Groups, Hilbert Space and Differential Geometry" by Peter Szekeres as an ideal resource, noting its comprehensive coverage of relevant mathematical concepts. There is a consensus that Arfken's book, while useful for problem-solving, lacks the depth needed for formal mathematical understanding and is more of a reference guide than a textbook. Other suggestions include caution against using Arfken and mention of Frankel's work, which is deemed less relevant due to its focus on geometry. Overall, Szekeres is highlighted as the most fitting choice for the original poster's needs.
Boltzmann2012
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I have seen many posts on the same topic but I was unable to come to a coherent conclusion. I have seen people reffering to Arfken or Mary Boas.
I have sufficient knowledge in linear algebra, statistics and calculus in many variables. I am presently taking a course in complex analysis. I would like to know if there is any book on a slightly higher footing which would help me understand the advanced math in quantum mechanics and general relativity.

Regards
Boltzmann 2012
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like this book is a good fit to you:

Peter Szekeres - A Course in Modern Mathematical Physics: Groups, Hilbert Space and Differential Geometry
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521829607/?tag=pfamazon01-20

I'm currently studying this book. It covers the mathematics for both quantum mechanics and general relativity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Huqinpku said:
It looks like this book is a good fit to you:

Peter Szekeres - A Course in Modern Mathematical Physics: Groups, Hilbert Space and Differential Geometry
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521829607/?tag=pfamazon01-20

I'm currently studying this book. It covers the mathematics for both quantum mechanics and general relativity.

I second this reccomendation, it's a very nice book. Stay away from Arfken!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Arfken is very good but it's not what I consider a 'mathematical physics' textbook. It's a cookbook for solving problems, not learning the math necessary for formalism.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
While Frankel is interesting (I recently checked it out from my library),
it is focused on "Geometry" [as its title suggests].
I think Szekeres would be more appropriate for the OP.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
545
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K