Which Answer is Not Needed to Determine the Exact Order of These Stones?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter some_one
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining which of four given clues is unnecessary for establishing the exact order of four stones arranged in a line. The stones vary in size (small and large) and color (green and purple). Participants explore the implications of each clue and how they relate to one another in the context of solving the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest analyzing the clues to see which can be omitted while still allowing for a solution to the arrangement of stones.
  • One participant proposes that clue 2 is unnecessary because it can be inferred from clue 1, which leads to the same conclusion about the sizes of the stones.
  • Another participant challenges this by stating that while the first and third stones differ in size, it does not imply that the big stones must be close together, providing a counterexample arrangement.
  • Participants express uncertainty about how to approach the problem and whether it relates to axiomatic reasoning.
  • One participant mentions needing to learn how to solve such problems for an upcoming exam.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on which clue is unnecessary, as participants present differing interpretations and reasoning regarding the implications of the clues.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion about the problem-solving process and the relationships between the clues, indicating a need for clearer understanding of the logical connections involved.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals preparing for exams that involve logical reasoning or problem-solving with constraints may find this discussion relevant.

some_one
Messages
78
Reaction score
1
on a table we arrange in a line four stones.
two of them are small
two of them are large
two of them are green
two of them are purple

which one of the answers are not needed in order to determine the exact order of this stones?

1.each green stone stayes between a big stone and a small stone
2.both of the big stones are close one to the another
3.the stone on the right edge is purple
4.the green stones have the same size

i don't know where to start
how to deside what answer to start with??
i don't know how to find this answer
??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
some_one said:
on a table we arrange in a line four stones.
two of them are small
two of them are large
two of them are green
two of them are purple

which one of the answers are not needed in order to determine the exact order of this stones?

1.each green stone stayes between a big stone and a small stone
2.both of the big stones are close one to the another
3.the stone on the right edge is purple
4.the green stones have the same size

1st, try and figure out what the order is by looking at all the clues:

1. "each green stone stayes between a big stone and a small stone"
Well, #1 tells you quite a bit. Each green stone is between two stones, one big, one small. Hence, you can conclude that:
A) neither green stone is on an end
B) both green stones are in the middle
C) because the stones are either green or purple, the stones on the ends are necessarily purple. So it goes Purple, Green, Green, Purple.
D) the 1st and 3rd cannot both match in size
E) the 2nd and 4th cannot both match in size
F) The order is necessarily one of:
- Big, Big, Small, Small
- Big, Small, Small, Big
- Small, Big, Big, Small
- Small, Small, Big, Big

That one clue told us a LOT.

2. "both of the big stones are close one to the another"
This tells us that the order is one of:
- Big, Big, Small, Small
- Small, Big, Big, Small
- Small, Small, Big, Big

3. "the stone on the right edge is purple"
This tells us nothing new. Already, we know that this is the useless piece of information. All it tells us is that the order is one of:
- Green, Green, Purple, Purple
- Green, Purple, Green, Purple
- Purple, Green, Green, Purple

But we already know the EXACT order of the colors thanks to #1. Hence, without even looking at the rest of the clues, we know the answer is #3, because #3 told us only a small chunk of what #1 already told us. So any conclusion we can make with #3 could be equally made with #1, therefore #3 is extraneous. But we can keep going anyway.

4. "the green stones have the same size"
That's helpful. It doesn't tell us anything directly about the order, but with #1 and #3, it tells us exactly what we needed to know.

All together
With #1, we know the Color order is:
Purple, Green, Green, Purple
And we know the size order is one of:

I. Big, Big, Small, Small
II. Big, Small, Small, Big
III. Small, Big, Big, Small
IV. Small, Small, Big, Big

So, after clue #1, all that remains is to figure out which order the sizes are in. With clue #2, we can eliminate possibility II, because the big stones must be close to each other. The remaining options are:
I. Big, Big, Small, Small
III. Small, Big, Big, Small
IV. Small, Small, Big, Big

With clue #4 (clue #3 tells us nothing new), we know that since the green's must have the same size, therefore the two in the middle must have the same size, hence eliminating possibilities I and IV. So the only remaining possibility is:
III. Small, Big, Big, Small

Clearly, because #3 told us something that we already learned from #1, #3 is a correct answer to the question. However, the question is (in our due diligence) whether #1 is necessary?

Suppose we didn't have clue #1. We would know:
2.both of the big stones are close one to the another
3.the stone on the right edge is purple
4.the green stones have the same size

So we'd know the size order is one of:
- Big, Big, Small, Small
- Small, Big, Big, Small
- Small, Small, Big, Big

And we'd know the color order could be:
- Green, Green, Purple, Purple
- Purple, Green, Green, Purple

But we wouldn't know which of those would be correct. Hence, #1 is clearly necessary (as it should be, since it told us a LOT of information).

DaveE
 
Last edited:
ye but we you also could say that the second answer comes from the first
answer
because one of the conclusions that comes from the first answer is that the first and third rocks differ in size
and so does the 2nd and 4th.

in the second answer we get the same conclusion
so the 2nd one is unnecessary
where is my mistake?
 
i havnt bothered to work it out but if you don't know where to start
to answer you question:

leave out clue no.1
can you solve with only clues 2,3,4

if not then
leave out clue no.2
can you solve with only clues 1,3,4

if not then
leave out clue no.3
can you solve with only clues 1,2,4
etc etc

eventually you'll find that you don't need one of the clues
 
Are you sure this is not a homework in axiomatics?
 
some_one said:
ye but we you also could say that the second answer comes from the first answer because one of the conclusions that comes from the first answer is that the first and third rocks differ in size and so does the 2nd and 4th.

Close, but not quite.

You're correct that the 1st and 3rd differ in size, and the 2nd and 4th differ in size, BUT that doesn't necessarily mean that the big stones are close together. Using only clue #1, a potential arrangement would be:

Big, Small, Small, Big

1st and 3rd differ in size (Big/Small), and 2nd and 4th differ in size (Small/Big), so it's totally valid, even though the two "Big" stones are as far apart as possible.

DaveE
 
thanks
i understand your solution
 
i don't know if this is axiomatics
but i need to learn solving this kind of questions
for "asat" exam in my country
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K