Which calculator is best for solving complex physics problems?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around selecting the best calculator for solving complex physics problems, particularly in the context of university studies. Participants explore various models, their capabilities, and their suitability for both coursework and examinations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the best calculator among the TI-Nspire CX, Casio fX-CG20, and HP 75mhz, emphasizing the need for a powerful processor and versatility.
  • Another participant asserts that all mentioned calculators are top of the line for their respective brands.
  • A different participant suggests that the TI-Nspire may be unnecessary, sharing their positive experience with the TI-89 for Electrical Engineering courses.
  • One participant modifies the question to ask which of the two calculators is better, indicating a narrowed focus on comparison.
  • Another participant introduces the idea of considering older, non-graphing calculators like the HP 15C, suggesting they may be more versatile for coursework.
  • For physics, one participant recommends the TI-89 for ease of use and the HP 50G for its additional functions, noting its effectiveness in RPN mode.
  • Suggestions for pocket calculators include the HP 35s, TI-36x pro, and Casio fx 115ES, highlighting their acceptance in professional exams.
  • There is mention of the HP Prime as a potential option, though it is suggested that it may be more than necessary for the user's needs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the necessity and suitability of various calculators, with no consensus reached on a single best option. Multiple competing views remain regarding the best choice for different contexts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that graphing calculators may not be allowed in exams, which could influence the choice of calculator. Additionally, there are varying opinions on the importance of graphing capabilities versus other functions.

ecpietscheck
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello physics community,
I am about to start my university studies and I am wondering which calculator to buy, a: TI-Nspire CX graphing calculator, Casio fX-CG20 graphing calculator or an HP 75mhz, 2300 functor, 3-1/5"x7-1/5"x9/10" graphing calculator.
I simply want the best of the best, the one that has got better processor and higher versatility for resolving complex problems.
May you please suggest?
Thankyou!
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
By the way, all of the previous are top of the line for each brand.
 
I don't think you'll need an NSpire.
I use an 89 and it's done everything I've ever needed it to (taking Electrical Engineering)

Keep in mind that for most university course you will not be allowed to bring graphing calculators into exams
 
alright so i will change the question up a bit.
which one of them two is better?
thankyou anyhow!
 
anyone?
 
I'll bump this for you and for all students with similar questions. Have you even considered an older, non-graphing calculator like the HP 15C? Very capable machines, and without the graphing capabilities, you might be able to use it in all your courses.
 
For Physics:
Graphing: Ti-89 for the quick and easy choice. You can't go wrong.
Hp 50G for more functions and features, if you use in RPN mode, not really that great in algebraic mode.

A good math package as an app or software for a laptop. There are several low cost to free options. Then buy a good pocket calculator for exams or general homework.
Suggestions:
Hp 35s (programmable, pretty much only reason, has 32 K ram and is OS selectable RPN or algebraic (EOS)).
Ti-36x pro
Casio fx 115ES
in that order. There are other good pocket calculators, I name the three above as they are also allowed on the NCEES EIT or PE exams.

You might look at an Hp Prime, but it is more than you would need.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
23K
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
63K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
19K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
39K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K