Which code has superior pseudopotentials for ab initio quantum calculations?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
4 replies · 14K views
Physicslad78
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Guys, I have a questiom. Which do you think is better to use when it comes to ab initio quantum calculations the VASP code or the ESPRESSO code. I am a beginner in computational physics and I would like to know the difference. If you can help me in that, I would more than grateful.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't use either (I use LAPW method), but their both plane-wave / pseudopotential codes. I think that VASP is supposed to have a bit more bells and whistles (which may be of help since you say that you're a newbie). The upside to ESPRESSO (or PWscf) is that it's free.

Maybe you would want to take a look at abinit as it's also free.
 
I've also heard from some colleagues that VASP is much faster than ESPRESSO but I did not test this myself.
If you need technical support, so probably VASP is the way to go.
 
Thanks a lot guys. I am trying to reproduce some results.I will try using ESPRESSO.. I am trying to implement the Tight binding model...Is there anywhere I can look at that can help me in doing that?


Thanks again
 
VASP also has some of the "best" USPP and PAW pseudopotentials made. They converge really well with plane-wave cutoff energy. I can't say the same for other plane-wave codes like CASTEP.

modey3