Which constants to use in Saha Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter leroyjenkens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Saha Equation, specifically the challenges of unit cancellation when using constants like the Boltzmann constant, electron mass, and Planck's constant. The user initially struggled with achieving a unitless final answer due to incorrect unit conversions and misinterpretation of the equation. After clarification, it was determined that the mass of the electron should be expressed in eV/c², while the Boltzmann constant (k) is in eV/K, and Planck's constant (h) in eV·s. Ultimately, the user realized an error in referencing the equation, which contributed to the confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Saha Equation in astrophysics
  • Familiarity with physical constants: Boltzmann constant (k), Planck's constant (h), and electron mass
  • Knowledge of unit conversions between SI units and electronvolts (eV)
  • Basic principles of dimensional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and applications of the Saha Equation in stellar astrophysics
  • Study dimensional analysis techniques for ensuring unit consistency in equations
  • Explore the significance of the Boltzmann constant in thermodynamics and statistical mechanics
  • Learn about the conversion between SI units and electronvolts for various physical constants
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in astrophysics, physicists dealing with thermodynamic equations, and anyone working with the Saha Equation in stellar modeling.

leroyjenkens
Messages
616
Reaction score
49
I'll post a picture of the equation and a picture of the problem I'm being asked. My problem is I can't get the units to cancel. This is a ratio, so the final answer is supposed to be unitless. The exponential term obviously needs the units to cancel, so I chose the correct Boltzmann constant for the units to cancel in that one, so I think I'm good there. The first term with the Pe in the denominator always gives me meters cubed as the units. So if I can get inverse meters cubed from the second term, then I'd be ok and all the units would be cancelled. But that crazy 2nd term with the 3/2 exponent gives me a crazy result for units, no matter what I do. I've tried expressing electron mass in both kilograms and electronvolts, and I've tried expressing Planck's constant in both electronvolts and in Joules, and no matter what I do, I end up with units like this: K3/2s6kg-3/2m-6
Stuff like that. That's no where near being able to cancel, no matter what I do.
So even ignoring the fact that the units don't cancel, I still don't get the result that's in the solution manual.
If anyone here has had experience with the Saha equation, you've probably done something like this and dealt with this problem before. It seems unavoidable.
Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • saha.jpg
    saha.jpg
    4.9 KB · Views: 580
  • prob.jpg
    prob.jpg
    42.9 KB · Views: 559
Physics news on Phys.org
It's been a while since I had Stellar Astrophysics, but let's see:

mass of the electron should be in eV/c2 (I like eV better than SI units)
k is eV/K
T is K
h is eV⋅s

so that's eV/c2⋅eV/K⋅K/(eV⋅s)2 all to the 3/2

looks like everything cancels except c2 and s2, but c2=m2/s2 so all you're left with is (m2)3/2, which is just meters cubed. But, Pe is a density right? So, that is something per meters cubed which will cancel... I think. But, I don't think I made any mistakes in there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: leroyjenkens
Sorry it's (1/(m2))3/2
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: leroyjenkens
Chris B said:
Sorry it's (1/(m2))3/2
Thanks a lot. Turns out I wrote down the equation wrong, so every time I referenced the equation to see if I had it right, I kept looking at the wrong one that didn't include k in the numerator.
Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chris B

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K