Which countries have the highest quality military equipment?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JPC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on identifying the countries with the highest quality military equipment, specifically focusing on fighter jets, tanks, attack submarines, nuclear-capable submarines, and anti-air systems. Participants emphasize the superiority of American and British military technology over that of countries like North Korea, China, and India, which, despite their large military forces, lack the operational effectiveness and advanced capabilities of Western nations. The conversation highlights the importance of quality over quantity in military strength.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of military aircraft types, specifically fighter jets.
  • Familiarity with modern tank specifications and capabilities.
  • Knowledge of submarine classifications, particularly attack and nuclear submarines.
  • Awareness of anti-air defense systems and their strategic importance.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifications and capabilities of the F-35 Lightning II fighter jet.
  • Explore the features and performance of the Challenger 2 tank.
  • Investigate the operational roles of Virginia-class submarines.
  • Learn about the latest advancements in missile defense systems, such as the Aegis Combat System.
USEFUL FOR

Military analysts, defense contractors, and enthusiasts interested in comparing global military equipment quality and capabilities.

JPC
Messages
204
Reaction score
1
hey was wondering

Which are the best Fighters in the world ? An american F type, a Dassault, or other ?
Which are the best tanks in the world ?
Which are the best attack subs in the world (those to attack sea, and those to attack ground) ?
Which are the best Nuclear capability subs in the world ?
Which countries have the best anti-air systems in the world ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I love your military threads. I think you will attract only the primary interest of british and americans, most ever other country in the world has poor militaries. North Korea, China, India all have large military units, but they lack the ability to do with what they have that Americans and British can do with nearly identical and smaller numbers of soldiers. Those three countries cannot sail around half away around the world, start two wars, and draw only the protest of straw eating tree huggers.
 
I know there's also quantity, and not just quality

but its not the millitary strength I am interested in , its in the quality
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
8K
Replies
28
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
9K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
13K