Which filtration method is best for volatile solvents?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kuahji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Vacuum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparative effectiveness of gravity filtration and vacuum filtration for volatile solvents. Gravity filtration is preferred for larger particles and low boiling point solvents like ether and hexane, as it minimizes the risk of solvent evaporation and contamination. Vacuum filtration, often utilizing a filter aid such as diatomite, excels in filtering small particles and can expedite the drying process of crystals. However, it is less effective for rinsing and can lead to losses due to prolonged contact with rinse solvents.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravity filtration techniques
  • Familiarity with vacuum filtration methods
  • Knowledge of filter aids, specifically diatomite
  • Basic concepts of solvent properties, particularly boiling points
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of diatomite as a filter aid
  • Learn about the effects of boiling points on filtration methods
  • Explore the use of vacuum filtration with nonvolatile solvents
  • Investigate best practices for rinsing and recovering solids in filtration processes
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, laboratory technicians, and anyone involved in solvent filtration processes will benefit from this discussion, particularly those working with volatile solvents and seeking to optimize their filtration techniques.

kuahji
Messages
390
Reaction score
2
Just wondering if there was a website or something where I could get more information on the subjects. I understand the methods of procedure, just not the why would one method be used over the other. So, any help or links would be appreciated. :smile:
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
In my own experience, gravity filtration is used for filtering largers size particles through media that is fairly coarse (if you consider #2 Whatman coarse). You can look up the micron size in a chemical supply catalog like the VWR or Fisher catalog. Gravity filtration is also best used when the solvent has a low boiling point such as ether or hexane or when the solution is hot. Pulling a vacuum on hot solutions, especially flammable ones, can cause all kinds of problems. I have also seen vacuum filtration not filter small particles where a gravity filtration works fine. Apparently, vacuum can force some near pore size solids through the filter media where gravity filtration wouldn't. It is easier to quantitatively recover something from a gravity filtration in most cases. Gravity filtration is more useful for filtering gel type substances like nickel DMG.

Vacuum filtration is usually performed with a filter aid such as diatomite. The real advantage for the filter aid/vacuum filtration is in the filtration of very small particles such as decolorizing carbon. Air can be drawn through the filter cake to minimize losses and solvent can be easily applied to rinse a valuable solid. Gravity filtration is not as useful for rinsing crystals, for example, because the rinse solvent would be in contact with the product longer and result in greater losses. Vacuum filtration can be used to dry crystals quickly to speed their analysis. Gravity filtration would require a more lengthy drying step either in the hood or in an oven (or drying thimble).

Vacuum filtration is useful if you are in a hurry but if you don't want to tie yourself up monitoring a filtration, gravity filtration can give you time to do other tasks.

Hope it helps.
 
use both together - simple vacuum filtration is done still under gravity. check your sizes as chemisttree says.

PS vacuum caused by nonflammable solvents will work (try water). Dichloromethane as solvent will work
well.
 
reason:

Vacuum filtration is most suitable for nonvolatile solvents. If vacuum filtration is used with volatile solvent than the solvent might evaporate and contaminate your solid sample.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K