Which Introductory Physics Course Sequence Should I Take?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the choice between two introductory physics course sequences for incoming college freshmen, particularly for those considering a physics major. The focus is on the differences between a "highly recommended" sequence that incorporates relativity from the start and a traditional calculus-based sequence that introduces relativity later in the curriculum.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about their preparedness for the "highly recommended" sequence, given their limited background in physics and calculus.
  • Another participant mentions a similar course structure at Cornell University, highlighting the flexibility to switch between honors and non-honors courses based on performance.
  • Some participants suggest that attempting the honors course could be beneficial, with the option to drop if it becomes too challenging.
  • There is a suggestion to consult academic advisors for personalized guidance regarding course selection.
  • One participant notes that the advising materials may not be updated to reflect the new "relativity-first" course structure.
  • A participant who took the "highly recommended" course shares a positive experience, noting smaller class sizes and engaging topics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on which course sequence to take, with some advocating for the honors sequence and others suggesting caution based on individual preparedness. No consensus is reached on the best choice.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention varying experiences and policies at different universities, indicating that course structures and advising practices may differ significantly. There is uncertainty regarding the implications of choosing one sequence over the other for future coursework.

Who May Find This Useful

Incoming college freshmen considering physics majors, students evaluating introductory physics courses, and those interested in course selection strategies in STEM fields.

eay444
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm going to be a freshman next year in college and the school I'm going to offers two sequences for possible physics majors. The "highly recommended" sequence is a modern introduction made up of three courses which introduces physics by incorporating relativity from the beginning. The other sequence is simply a calculus based introduction which introduces relativistic mechanics at the end of the second course and throughout the third course. I've taken phyisics in high school but the math didn't involve calculus and the course wasn't quite at the level that say an AP physics course would be taught. I have taken first semester calculus but I still would feel more comfortable taking the sequence that doesn't incorporate relativity right from the get go. But every handbook or physics major path description that I look at recommends the other course. I guess what I really want to know is what other people here have taken for their introductory physics courses and what you recommend I take. Also if I were to take the less recommended sequence would I be at a severe disadvantage when I start taking higher level physics courses?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which school is that? I've never heard of such a thing, but then again I'm just entering my freshmen year.
 
It's the University of Wisconsin Madison
 
Cornell University does something similar as well.

For prospective physics majors, it's highly recommended to take the honors sequences of mechanics (includes relativity). However, the course content in the beginning is extremely similar so that you can "correct" and switch out from the honors into the easier version without falling behind. You can also start off in the non-honors and switch up into the honors version if you find the regular course way too easy. Grades from homework and labs (and even the first test, if I recall correctly) transfer easily. The department wants to make sure you end up in the correct course, so they don't penalize you.

I'm in the exact same situation (no AP Physics in high school, but decent Calculus background) and I'm nervous about the honors course, but I think it's better to try. If you need to switch down to the regular version, then at least you can say you tried the honors. Also, I know it's common here for people to take the non-honors mechanics and then switch up into the honors version of second semester physics.

Obviously, you should check if your university has a similar switching policy, but I would imagine they would. Most places are reasonable with course adjustments within the first few weeks of the semester.
 
Oh, my bad when you said relativity I had a brain fart, I thought about general relativity! jeez, silly me, special relativity should be doable, I would recommend you to take the honours sequence as well. If it's too had you can always drop. Always try to aim higher. Well that's my 2 cents.
 
eay444 said:
It's the University of Wisconsin Madison

Really, this is something that you should ask your academic advisor. Or, if they used to do it when I went to UW-Madison eons ago, you should ask the "generic" advisor. If you don't think this is satisfactory, go to the Dept's office and ask to speak to an undergraduate advisor who would know more about the nature of these courses/sequence. This person will get to talk to you about your background, etc., and with his/her knowledge of what these courses entails, can make a more informed recommendation to you.

When you get there, wave at the 2nd floor of Siegel Hall where I used to hang around!

Zz.
 
eay444 said:
But every handbook or physics major path description that I look at recommends the other course.

Are you referring to handbooks etc. that you found at UW-Madison? It may simply be the case that the "relativity-first" version of the intro physics course is relatively (:wink:) new and not all the advising materials have been updated yet..
 
I chose the "highly recommended" one. It turned out to be pretty nice - the class is smaller, your classmates are probably going to be your classmates for the next four years (like it or not...). And those topics indeed "spice up" the course, IMHO
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K