Which is Greater: Binding Energy Per Nucleon of Parent or Daughter Nucleus?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a nuclear decay problem involving a parent nucleus and its daughter nuclei, focusing on the comparison of binding energy per nucleon (BEPN) between them. The original poster is trying to determine whether the binding energy per nucleon of the parent nucleus is greater than or less than that of the daughter nuclei.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of energy and rest masses in relation to the decay process. The original poster expresses difficulty in linking mass defect to binding energy without specific values for mass number and atomic number. Others suggest making assumptions about the number of nucleons and the nature of the decay.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding assumptions and the relationship between binding energy and stability, but there is no explicit consensus on the comparison of A and B.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of specific data on mass numbers and atomic numbers, which complicates the analysis of binding energy per nucleon. There is also mention of the general tendency for decays to lead to more stable configurations.

kihr
Messages
98
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A nucleus of mass M + m1 is at rest and decays into two daughter nuclei of equal mass M/2 each. The binding energy per nucleon for the parent nucleus is A and that for the daughter nucleus is B. Which is greater A or B?


Homework Equations


Binding energy per nucleon= Mass defect of nucleus / mass number


The Attempt at a Solution



I am unable to link the given masses of nuclei (parent and daughters) with their mass defect in the absence of data on A and Z. I need a few hints on how to proceed with tackling this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
think about rest masses & conservation of energy

and remember, all up, there's likely to be the same number of nucleons before and after the decay...
 
Yes I do understand that in this case there would be a generation of energy because of the difference in rest masses between the parent and daughters. Also I am aware that energy would be conserved, and that this information would help in finding out, for instance, the kinetic energy of the two daughter nuclei. But how does this get linked up with the binding energy per nucleon when I do not know the values of A? Also the concept of binding energy per nucleon is relevant for individual nuclei, the data for which does not appear to be available in the problem. I would request for a few more tips. Thanks.
 
if you need to, make some assumptions

first assume N nucleons in the parent, each daughter can be assumed to have N/2. Each daughter will have the same BEPN of B, whilst the parent has B.

also decays generally move to a more stable low energy configuration...

If you want to get right down into, make some assumption about the type of decay & put some limits on numbers...
 
OK. Let me try out the way you have suggested.
 
Going by the BEPN versus A (mass number) graph, in the case of fission (to which this problem appears to relate) the BEPN for the fission products is less than that of the parent nucleus. If this logic is to be applied A > B should be the correct answer. However, I understand that it is to be the reverse. This is what I am unable to understand. I would appreciate some further guidance. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K