Nuclear Stability: A Comparison of Binding Energy and Packing Fraction

In summary, the binding energy per nucleon and packing fraction are both measures of a nucleus's stability, but they are calculated using different definitions of mass defect. A higher binding energy per nucleon indicates a more stable nucleus, while a smaller packing fraction does not necessarily indicate a less stable nucleus despite the formula BE/A=PF*c^2. This discrepancy can be solved by understanding the different definitions and contexts of mass defect.
  • #1
Krushnaraj Pandya
Gold Member
697
73

Homework Statement


This is a conceptual question I have, the binding energy per nucleon is mass defect*c^2/mass number while the packing fraction is mass defect/mass number. A higher binding energy per nucleon indicates a more stable nucleus BUT a smaller packing fraction indicates a more stable nucleus as well despite BE/A=PF*c^2 as per the formulas- what blunder am I making?

Homework Equations


mentioned above

The Attempt at a Solution


mentioned above
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Let me re-frame the question, a higher mass defect means more energy to hold the nucleus together and a smaller atomic mass means less nucleons and radius, according to this a higher packing fraction should indicate a more stable nucleus not a less stable one, I'd be really grateful for any help to understand this-Thank you
 
  • #3
can anyone solve this discrepancy?
 
  • #4
Packing fraction is a term from mass spectrometry, in which "mass defect" is defined differently than in nuclear physics.
 
Back
Top