Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the choice of journal for publishing research, specifically comparing the Royal Chemical Society Journals (e.g., Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics) and Materials Science Forum (Trans Tech Publications). Participants explore factors influencing this decision, including impact factors and the relevance of the journal to the research content.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest that the choice of journal depends on various factors, including the content of the paper and the journal's focus.
- There is a mention of the importance of maximizing the chances of acceptance by selecting a journal that aligns with the type of work being submitted.
- One participant questions the relevance of seeking advice from strangers on the internet, suggesting that collaborators or supervisors should provide guidance on publication choices.
- Another participant expresses a desire to publish in the journal with the highest impact factor but is uncertain about how to determine which journal has a higher impact factor.
- Concerns are raised about the lack of support from colleagues or supervisors in the publication process, with one participant indicating a reluctance to ask colleagues due to potential repercussions.
- There is a request for clarification on the impact factor of a specific journal, indicating a need for more information on this metric.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree that the choice of journal is complex and context-dependent, with no consensus on which journal is definitively better. Multiple competing views remain regarding the best approach to selecting a journal for publication.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include the lack of specific information on the impact factors of the journals in question and the varying levels of support available to participants in their respective research environments.