Which one of these two statements is wrong ?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Statement 'a' is incorrect because while every set of n linearly independent vectors can form a basis for a vector space, they must also span that vector space, which is not explicitly stated. Statement 'b' is also incorrect; an invertible matrix is not necessarily diagonalizable, as demonstrated by the example matrix D = [1, 1; 0, 1], which is invertible but not diagonalizable. The determinant of D is 1, confirming its invertibility while lacking a diagonal form.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and their dimensions
  • Knowledge of linear independence and spanning sets
  • Familiarity with matrix diagonalization
  • Basic concepts of determinants and invertible matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of vector spaces and the criteria for a set of vectors to form a basis
  • Study the conditions under which a matrix is diagonalizable
  • Explore counterexamples of invertible matrices that are not diagonalizable
  • Learn about the Jordan canonical form as an alternative to diagonalization
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of vector spaces and matrix theory.

Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
a. every set of n linearly independent vectors are basis of a vector space with dimension n

b. An invertible matrix is necessarily diagonalizable

they both seems wrong to me, but only one suppose to be.

'a' sounds wrong because the n vectors must also span the vector space

and 'b' because I don't see the relation between invertible and diagonalizable
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yankel said:
'a' sounds wrong because the n vectors must also span the vector space
Which vector space?
 
Yankel said:
a. every set of n linearly independent vectors are basis of a vector space with dimension n

b. An invertible matrix is necessarily diagonalizable

they both seems wrong to me, but only one suppose to be.

'a' sounds wrong because the n vectors must also span the vector space

and 'b' because I don't see the relation between invertible and diagonalizable

n linearly independent vectors span a vector space with n dimensions.
Since the vector space has only n dimensions, those vectors necessarily must span that vector space.

For 'b' you should try to find a counter example.
Can you think of a matrix that is not diagonalizable, but still has a non-zero determinant?
 
to extend serena statement.

If D is a diagnizable matrix then there exists an invertible nxn matrix P
such that D = $P^{-1}AP$ where A is the matrix with the eigen values of D on its diagonals.

Now take D = $\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$. whose eigen values are 1,1. Now if D is diagnoziable there would exist a nxn invertible matrix P such that

D = $P^{-1}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}P$, now 4 $\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$ is just the identity matrix.
so D = $P^{-1}P = I$, since $D \not = I$, it is clear that D is not diagnizable.

Yet D is invertible Det(D) = 1.
 
Last edited:
thanks everyone for your answers, it's very helpful.

I still don't fully understand why when the dimension is n the vector must also span.

I will try to look for some further material on it

thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K