Which Ph.D is More Respected: Computer Engineering or Quantum Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicscrap
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the perceived difficulty and respect associated with pursuing a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering versus Quantum Physics. Many participants agree that Quantum Physics is generally considered more intellectually demanding due to its reliance on advanced mathematics. However, the conversation emphasizes that the respectability of a Ph.D. is not solely based on the field but also on the quality of research and personal passion for the subject. The importance of choosing a field based on genuine interest rather than external validation is highlighted, as well as the challenges of graduate-level studies compared to undergraduate education. Ultimately, the consensus is that pursuing what one loves is crucial for success in any academic endeavor.
  • #31
Norman said:
I disagree with this. I know people who went to a good state school (not top of the world but in the top 35 schools nationally) and they got into the graduate program at MIT for engineering. You do need to go to a good school for your undergrad. It is important. But really, where you do your graduate degree for physics is not as important as who your advisor is and whether or not you are doing work that is going to get you employed after you graduate. Read ZapperZ's articles entitled "So You Want to be a Physicist"

Good luck.

I'm glad to hear your opinion. I am going to the university of Puerto Rico at mayaguez (has anyone heard anything good o bad about it?). I've been doing a lot of searching on the net and can't find any reviews or opinions of it, other than UPR opinion :( . What gives me hope is that they have research programs on parallel computing with IBM and HP and that's the field that appeals to me the most so far. Regretably I get the distinct feeling that UPR is just a afirmative action engineer farm (minorities and women) for US giant corporations looking to meet their quotas.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Norman said:
I disagree with this. I know people who went to a good state school (not top of the world but in the top 35 schools nationally) and they got into the graduate program at MIT for engineering. You do need to go to a good school for your undergrad. It is important. But really, where you do your graduate degree for physics is not as important as who your advisor is and whether or not you are doing work that is going to get you employed after you graduate. Read ZapperZ's articles entitled "So You Want to be a Physicist"

Good luck.

Perhaps, you have misunderstood me. When i say normal school, i mean the one that is about or lower state university. I have talked to few undergrad student who graduate this year, most of them couldn't get into top college even they have quite high GPA but few got into really good school. When i say low, there is stil possiblility.
BTW, i am math major~
 
  • #33
OP: Why not do your undergrad studies in the US and your graduate studies in another country?
 
  • #34
Hi all!

What about mixing the two fields?

I don't know too much about how things go in the US, but where I am at, (Hungary,Europe) it is possible to mix these fields. For example I know a prof. In my country who is involved in some Quantum Cryptographyc researches.
It means that person is something like a prof. in both fields. He has lots of stuff in Quantum Mechanics and in Computational Science as well.
Here, in Hungary, to do something like this you have to be a physician at first place.

I think those guys at IBM doing some researches in quantum information are some 'masters' of both fields, either.
 
  • #35
hmm...base on ur interest...
for me , quantum physics is the wise choice
 
  • #36
Holier than thou...

I am not too sure why this poster feels compelled to sign up for the Ph.D capmaign, so young. Not even in college yet? I'd be surprised if most seniors know whether they will be enrolling into a graduate program.

Either way, you can kiss your private sector work good-bye with either Ph.D. Or at least, don't be surprised if companies aren't looking for doctors, but instead someone who can work.
 
  • #37
Plastic Photon said:
Either way, you can kiss your private sector work good-bye with either Ph.D. Or at least, don't be surprised if companies aren't looking for doctors, but instead someone who can work.

Yes, because companies never employ Ph.Ds. And that is why a quick search on Monster for "Physics Ph.D." only yeilds about 173 different jobs.

Why don't you take a look at the US Department of Labor's analysis done in 2004 on a being a physicist (http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos052.htm#emply) before you start writing a post implying a Ph.D. won't be able to find a job outside academia and government. Especially since 33% of them work in industry.

Enough said about your poorly thought out argument.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #38
Plastic Photon said:
Either way, you can kiss your private sector work good-bye with either Ph.D. Or at least, don't be surprised if companies aren't looking for doctors, but instead someone who can work.
If you want to go work in a bank then, of course, you shouldn't do extended study. You should join a company's graduate scheme straight after leaving uni.

However, if you want to do any original scientific research, you need a PhD.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
708
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
515
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K