Which Power Transmission Option is Best for Connecting a Motor to a Fan?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fantastic Fox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fan Motor
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of a power transmission system connecting a motor to a fan. Participants explore various options including direct couplings, belt drives, and even hydraulic drives, considering factors such as complexity, efficiency, and safety. The conversation includes technical specifications and design considerations relevant to the application.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about whether to use a direct coupling, universal joint, or belt drive, noting that belt drives seem more complicated and time-consuming.
  • Another participant recommends spider type couplings for close-coupled setups, suggesting they are easier to specify and install compared to belt drives, which they reserve for situations where components cannot be aligned on the same centerline.
  • A different approach is proposed involving hydraulic drives, suggesting the use of an automatic transmission from a car as a potential solution.
  • The original poster indicates a preference for using a coupling, mentioning the possibility of using universal joints if necessary, and questions the need for bearings on both shafts when using a coupling.
  • Participants discuss the power requirements, with one specifying a 5.5kW motor and considering the implications of using different motor sizes for efficiency.
  • There is mention of a 1:1 transmission ratio for the belt drive, and a participant questions whether transmission ratios can be changed using a coupling.
  • Another participant notes that most fans of the specified size are typically belt-driven, indicating a common practice in the industry.
  • One participant ultimately decides to proceed with a belt drive, questioning the necessity of keys when using taper lock pulleys, and receives confirmation that they are not needed if installed correctly.
  • The original poster reflects on their decision-making process, citing dissatisfaction with coupling options and logistical considerations as reasons for choosing a belt drive.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the best power transmission method, with some favoring couplings and others advocating for belt drives. There is no clear consensus on the optimal solution, as various factors such as setup geometry and component alignment influence preferences.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific design constraints and considerations, such as the need for bearings, the complexity of setups, and the efficiency of different motor sizes. However, these factors remain unresolved and depend on the specific application and design choices.

Fantastic Fox
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I have to design a power transmission from a motor to a fan. There are no restrictions on what I design.

I'm not sure whether I should use a direct (flexible) coupling, a universal joint, or a belt drive. I have designed a belt drive before, and from looking at catalogues, it looks like it's slightly more complicated and time-consuming than the other options since I'll need bearings, pulleys, belts, spacers, two shafts, keys, keyways, etc. and I can simply use a taper lock with coupling. The housing for a belt drive will also be slightly more complicated.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different types? I know with belt drives is there is a jam the belt will slip, so there is a safety element in choosing it.

What would you recommend? I'm leaning towards either a coupling or a belt drive at the moment. I need to decide on one in a few hours.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The easiest things I have ever used are spider type couplings, like those produced by Lovejoy, for this purpose. Of course, you don't say anything about the geometry of the set up you are looking at. These couplers will work very well if you are OK with being close coupled. If you need to separate the two components by a larger distance you can possibly go with a double ended flex pack type of coupler which will get you a little more distance. The nice thing about these is that they are relatively easy to spec out and the only real thing you need is a key way in most cases. Some low torque applications you can get away with just a couple of set screws to mount the coupler.

Belt drives I only consider if I can not mount the two components on the same centerline and the speeds are low. There are some pretty high speed belt systems out there, but the complexity in your system increases.
 
How about something different, like hydraulic drive? Maybe an automatic transmission out of an old small car from the junkyard...
 
The geometry of the set up is up to me. I'm going to try to design it using a coupling. They'll be close coupled, and I'll use taper-locks to fix the coupling to the shaft, so there's no need to design keys and keyways. I'll just have to decide on a suitable type of coupling before selecting a suitable size.

If it doesn't work out, I'll use a belt drive. It's running at less than 600rpm (don't have the exact figure off the top of my head) so it could even run with universal joints.

Is there any advantage/disadvantage in separating the motor and fan by a larger distance? (Ignoring the set up logistics)

Using a coupling, is there a need for bearings on both shafts?

Any ideas on what sort of housing I should use if I proceed with the coupling and how I should go about designing it?
 
Last edited:
How big is this? Or, how many hp?
 
5.5kW motor
 
Fantastic Fox said:
5.5kW motor

So 7.3 horsepower... Maybe the car automatic transmission is a bit of overkill, then. What transmission ratio(s) are you considering?
 
More than likely 1:1.

But, out of interest, could you change transmission ratios using a coupling?

I'll connect a frequency changer to the motor to vary fan speed.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps you ought to share your full project brief, or at least the key objectives?
 
  • #10
I have to design a connection between a motor and a fan @ 10000 m^3/hr. I also have to design a suitable housing. There are no other restrictions.

I selected a 5.5kW motor using a chart, but I could also use say a 7.5kW motor on 3/4 power (both are equally efficient).
 
  • #11
I've had a look at belt drives and couplings and have produced some basic design specs.

The belt drive is a very simple 1:1 transmission. Both pulleys have the same pitch diameter

To get a suitable size coupling (bore for the shafts I'm using), I need to use a 11kW motor running at 1/2 power, which as it turns out, is actually slightly more efficient than a 7.5kW at 3/4 power and a 5.5kW at full power.

I think I'll proceed with the coupling since there's less involved (It'll save me having to draw a pulley, and design keys and seats).
 
  • #13
russ_watters said:
Most fans of this size are belt-driven.

I actually ended up going with a belt drive.

One question: Am I right in thinking you don't need any keys if you use taper lock pulleys?
 
  • #14
Fantastic Fox said:
I actually ended up going with a belt drive.

One question: Am I right in thinking you don't need any keys if you use taper lock pulleys?

correct

they have to installed right the first time other wise they can come lose and cause damage.
follow the manufacturers instructions regarding the torqueing and anchoring of the taper lock on the shaft
 
  • #15
Fantastic Fox said:
I actually ended up going with a belt drive.

One question: Am I right in thinking you don't need any keys if you use taper lock pulleys?
Just out of curiosity, what led you to do the belt and pulleys?
 
  • #16
FredGarvin said:
Just out of curiosity, what led you to do the belt and pulleys?

From the catalogue I have, I wasn't happy with the choice of couplings.

Also, the availability of a certain type of stand. The stands are better suited to belt drives.

It'll work out cheaper.

I also thought about using a combination of couplings and belt drive, but it was an overcomplicated, more expensive and unnecessary solution. (It would involve designing two shafts, the need for more bearings, two couplings, and the belt drive, etc)

I know I came across as a bit all over the place from my above posts. I had a couple of different ideas and was thinking out loud.
 
  • #17
Ah. Fair enough. I was just wondering.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
15K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K