Which Program to Use for Modeling Gas Turbine Combustor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Program
Click For Summary
For modeling a gas turbine combustor, both CFX and FEMLAB are viable options, with FEMLAB offering a more user-friendly GUI for pre- and post-processing, though it may require some customization. CFX is considered a professional package that handles complex models effectively, making it suitable for more advanced applications. Users suggest that the choice between the two depends on the complexity of the project, with FEMLAB being faster for simpler models. There is uncertainty about the program DYMAIN, and it may not be widely recognized in this context. For best practices, consulting industry papers on gas turbine combustor modeling is recommended.
stan
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
hi

i need to model a gas turbine combustor and i was wondering which tool to use?

is CFX or FEMLAB better? i would like the most straight forward step to achieve this task. Does FEMLAB needs programing to obtain the mesh, which program is more userfriendly?

Btw,has anyone heard of the program DYMAIN? Would it be able to model a combustor as well?

If not, any suggestions on which user friendly program to use?
Any answers to my queries would be welcomed.

Regards,
Stan
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
stan said:
is CFX or FEMLAB better? i would like the most straight forward step to achieve this task. Does FEMLAB needs programing to obtain the mesh, which program is more userfriendly?

Femlab is a complete package, it is more customizable than your traditional FE based package making it a bit more cruder to use in general, but it has a good GUI for pre- & post-processing so you aren't "forced" to write any code to get those stages done. I haven't used CFX but a couple of times but my impression of it is that it is a complete professional package with most the properties you'd be needing. I'd say it depends on the complexity of your approach, a relatively simplistic one I'd do with Femlab, tougher ones CFX will probably handle better (and be comparable in easier ones, Femlabs GUI is pretty modern and quick so doing relatively simple models with it is typically really fast).
 
Possibly FEMLAB and CFX are about the same.

FEMLAB - http://www.comsol.com/products/femlab/

ANSYS - http://www.ansys.com/products/cfx.asp

I don't know anyone who has done a side-by-side comparison.

I haven't used either, but I had a demonstration of CFX back when it was under AEA Technology, and it was one to the two top CFD packages, the other being STAR-CD.

If possible, try to find papers from the utility or aerospace (AIAA) industry on modeling gas turbine combustors. I believe both packages have a combustion or chemistry module.

I have not heard of DYMAIN. Is the spelling correct? There is dynamic FEA, which certainly incorporates different models than static FEA.

My company uses ABAQUS Explicit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
Replies
65
Views
5K