Which species of Fe are considered dissolved Fe?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the classification of Fe(OH)42- as a dissolved species of iron and its associated activity in solution. Participants clarify that while the question suggests all dissolved iron species have an activity of 0.1M, this is misleading. The activity of Fe(OH)42- is not 0.1M, as it is influenced by various equilibria involving Fe(II) and Fe(III) in water. The consensus is that the activity of dissolved iron species cannot be uniformly assumed to be 0.1M without considering the specific conditions and forms present in the solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of aqueous chemistry and iron species
  • Knowledge of chemical equilibria involving Fe(II) and Fe(III)
  • Familiarity with activity concepts in solution chemistry
  • Ability to interpret Eh-pH diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of chemical activity in aqueous solutions
  • Study the equilibria of iron species in water, focusing on Fe(II) and Fe(III)
  • Learn how to construct and interpret Eh-pH diagrams for iron
  • Explore the implications of dissolved species on environmental chemistry
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, environmental scientists, and professionals involved in water quality assessment and iron chemistry.

1question
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The question tells me that all dissolved iron species will have an activity of 0.1M. So is Fe(OH)42- considered a dissolved species of Fe, and if so, it will have an activity of 0.1M?

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



I want to say that it is not considered as such, but the fact that it is an ion troubles me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1question said:
The question tells me that all dissolved iron species will have an activity of 0.1M.

Doesn't sound correct to me, can you post entire question?
 
It's an assumption so that I can draw a simplified Eh-Ph diagram. It is not meant to be generally correct I believe.
 
Every water solution containing iron ions will also have many equilibria present, with numerous products of Fe(II) and Fe(III) reactions with water. You can assume activity of the main (dominating) form present in the solution to be 0.1 M, or you can assume sum of all forms present to be 0.1 M (it will be just a mass balance then), but in neither case activities of other forms will be 0.1 M.

Chances are this is just a lousy wording and there is a viable idea behind the statement, but without the context I can't see it.
 
I asked my Prof. It does not have an activity of 0.1M. Thanks for your help Borek.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K