Which uC is Best for Your Autonomous Robotics Project?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ionlylooklazy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projects Robotics
AI Thread Summary
Choosing the right microcontroller (uC) for an autonomous robotics project involves balancing power and affordability. The PIC series, particularly the PIC 18F4455, offers USB capabilities and can be cost-effective if built from scratch rather than purchasing expensive development boards. Basic Stamp modules are easier to start with due to lower initial costs but may limit future expansion due to restricted program space. Alternatives like Cypress's EZ-USB series, NXP's LPC ARM7, and TI's MSP430 are also recommended for their features and programming ease. Ultimately, the decision should consider both current needs and potential future project expansions.
ionlylooklazy
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
so, I've been looking into some uC projects as an extra hobby. no specific ideas yet besides a generic lil autonomous robot. but i am having dificulty deciding on what type of uC to use, and that's why I have come here :)

my thoughts:

i have experience with basic stamp, pic, and dsPIC(significant). I am also familiar with assembly(limited) & c/c++

i would prefer using a high level language like c/c++, which the pic supports. but looking at the cost of the development boards and programmers that microchip offers, it turns out to be a very expensive solution.

for the basic stamp, the actual modules themselves are expensive, but the devo boards, programmers, and the compiler (free!) are generally less expensive.

as for capabilities between the two, the basic stamp uses PBASIC, and it would suit me fine for a while, but I think the relatively limited program space would not suit me down the road, for expansionary projects.

so I am torn between power and affordability,

what do you recommend? are there any other uC's that would be appropriate for my experience/level/application?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Personally, I'd suggest the EZ-USB series from Cypress. They're a snap to connect to your computer, and they have a lot of features. I don't know how much the dev kits cost, but you may not even need one. You only need a couple of external components (oscillator, etc.) to build a complete system.

- Warren
 
If you want to target the PIC 18F4455 (or similar) chip with its USB capability, you can get started for less than $200 by buying the MPLAB ICD2 PC interface unit, downloading the free compiler (it loses some functionality after 60 days if you stay with the free version, but that should be fine for you for a while), and building your own PIC circuits by hand using SMT --> through hole conversion boards (sometimes called "surf boards"). The PIC 18F4455 comes in a QFP-44 SMT package that is still pretty reasonable to hand solder. I don't know the price offhand, but building your own starter board with that chip and the two connectors for USB and the ICD2 would be way cheaper than the $200+ starter boards that Microchip sells.


Microchip MPLAB software: http://www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=1406&dDocName=en019469&part=SW007002

MPLAB with ICD2 interface: http://www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=1406&dDocName=en010046

Prices in US: http://www.microchipdirect.com/ProductSearch.aspx?Keywords=DV164005


We've used the PIC 18F4455 on several in-house fixtures, and it's pretty easy to work with. I also like chroot's suggestion of the EZ-USB devices from Cypress. Having a USB interface into your projects gives you a nice natural way to combine your PC with your uC projects, and also gives you great experience in programming with the very popular USB interface.
 
Last edited:
Look at what I suggested in this other thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=176494

Basically I'd say
a) embedded small PC

b) LPC ARM7 from NXP

c) MSP430 from TI; you can order the USB programmer and
software kit from TI's eStore for $20 which is sufficient
to program all the smaller parts with the SPI-BI-WIRE
interface. For the larger pinout parts with true JTAG
programming I believe you need a more expensive
programmer but it's still cheaper than a lot PICs programmers.

d) Something like the ARM9 AT91RM9200 from Atmel,
though that's a pretty big PQFP package and a VERY
powerful microprocessor, so it might be overkill if you
want something more like a PIC.

e) Look at the 68HCxxx type microcontrollers if those
are still made/used, I recall those weren't bad in cost
and programming options, though really I'd use an
ARM7 before a 68HCxxx these days.

f) The RABBIT stuff:
http://www.rabbitsemiconductor.com/products/

g) THe TINI stuff:
http://www.maxim-ic.com/products/microcontrollers/tini/

h) Other MAXIM uCs:
http://www.maxim-ic.com/products/microcontrollers/

i) Some of the Zilog and other compatible
technology (Hitachi?) Z80 stuff is easy to program since
you can use an internal bootstrap loader and/or external
standard parallel FLASH / EPROM type stuff.

The Cypress uCs can be ok too, as berkeman said.
 
thanks for the recommendations
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top