Which W Boson Mediates e^- + ν_μ → μ^- + ν_e?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter QuantumCosmo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the scattering process e^- + ν_μ → μ^- + ν_e mediated by W bosons in the context of weak interactions. Participants explore the appropriate labeling of the W boson in a Feynman diagram representing this process, considering the implications of charge and particle-antiparticle relationships.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether to label the W boson as W^+ or W^- in the Feynman diagram, noting that both options seem relevant to the scattering process.
  • Another participant explains that the choice between W^+ and W^- depends on the direction of momentum flow and conservation laws, suggesting that both representations are equivalent.
  • A side note mentions that similar conventions apply to internal fermion lines, emphasizing the importance of consistency in labeling.
  • A later reply suggests simply labeling the W boson line as W±, indicating a preference for a neutral representation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to label the W boson in the diagram, with no consensus reached on whether to use W^+, W^-, or W±. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the most appropriate labeling convention.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence on momentum direction and charge conservation, but do not resolve the implications of these factors on the labeling choice.

QuantumCosmo
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hi,
lets say we have the scattering process [itex]e^- + \nu_{\mu} \rightarrow \mu^- + \nu_e[/itex] via the weak interaction. This would then be mediated by a W-Boson, right? Now my question ist: Which one?

The Feynman-Diagramm should then look like the one on the right:

http://accessscience.com/loadBinary.aspx?aID=9704&filename=450700FG0010.gif"

(in the line on top, one has to exchange [itex]e \rightarrow \mu[/itex]

I know that this diagramm actually represents two processes (which could be drawn as slightly "skewed" diagramms):
1) The electron emits a [itex]W^-[/itex] and thereby "changes" into an [itex]\nu_e[/itex]. This [itex]W^-[/itex] is then absorbed by the [itex]\nu_{\mu}[/itex] which therefore "changes into a [itex]\mu^-[/itex]
2) The [itex]\nu_{\mu}[/itex] emits a [itex]W^+[/itex] and changes into a [itex]\mu^-[/itex]. The [itex]W^-[/itex] is then absorbed by the [itex]e^-[/itex] and changes into a [itex]\nu_e[/itex]

So if I draw the Feynman-diagramm as in the link, is it ok to write [itex]W^+[/itex]? Because wouldn't that mean that the diagramm only represents option 2)? Or am I wrong to assume that [itex]W^+[/itex] and [itex]W^-[/itex] both have to do with the process and only one of the processes 1) and 2) is the "right" one?

I have a big exam in particle physics soon. If the professor asks me to draw the Feynman-diagramm for this process I simply wouldn't know what to write ( [itex]W^+[/itex], [itex]W^-[/itex] or maybe forget about the charge (just write [itex]W[/itex]) and hope the professor doesn't ask which of the W's it is?).

I know that my question is not very precise, so here is the short version:

What belongs in the diagramm?
a) W+
b) W-
c) simply W, because W+ and W- both have to do with the process
d) other

Thank you very much,
QuantumCosmo
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The [itex]W^+[/itex] and [itex]W^-[/itex] are related by a particle/anti-particle relationship, so for a virtual W, wether its charge positive or negative depends on how you implement conservation of momentum. You've perhaps heard the Feynman idea that an anti-particle is equivalent to a particle moving backwards in time? Have you studied charge conjugation symmetry?

What this means is that wether its a particle or anti-particle depends on which way you consider its momentum to be flowing. In the diagram you've drawn, the momentum of the internal W must be flowing towards the bottom node in the diagram for charge conservation to work.

If you want to draw a [itex]W^-[/itex], you also will reverse the direction of the four momentum. The two diagrams are completely equivalent, so ultimately it doesn't matter.
 
As a side note that may also be helpful, the same rules apply to internal fermion lines, but you just have to make sure that whatever you decide for a convention you keep it. I think the general rule is for internal fermions you draw the momentum lines in the same direction as the particle arrow on the propagator. This way all of your propagators are for the particle, not the anti-particle.
 
What belongs in the diagramm?

Label the line W±.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K