Understanding Neutron Star Formation Through Feynman Diagrams

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
doggydan42
Messages
169
Reaction score
18
Hello,

I recently watched a video as an introduction to Feynman diagrams for my own self-interest. The video gave a link to practice problems, and one of them was as follows:

In a neutron star gravitational collapse causes valence electrons to combine with protons. Draw a Feynman diagram representing this interaction.
$$p+e^{-} \rightarrow n + \nu_e
\\ uud+e^{-} \rightarrow udd + \nu_e$$

I understood most of the interaction and that there would be a W+ boson between the up quark and electron, though would the electron or up quark emit the boson, and why?

Thank you in advance
Screen Shot 2017-11-20 at 1.02.29 PM.png
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-11-20 at 1.02.29 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-11-20 at 1.02.29 PM.png
    47.9 KB · Views: 867
Physics news on Phys.org
doggydan42 said:
would the electron or up quark emit the boson

Neither. The boson is exchanged between the electron/neutrino and the up quark/down quark, but neither one can be said to be the "emitter". You just have a Feynman diagram (at lowest order) with two interaction vertices.
 
PeterDonis said:
Neither. The boson is exchanged between the electron/neutrino and the up quark/down quark, but neither one can be said to be the "emitter". You just have a Feynman diagram (at lowest order) with two interaction vertices.

So to the diagram, it does not matter if the curve drawn for the W boson is further left at the vertex with the electron, being that time increases to the right?

Or to rephrase the question, does it matter which particle, up quark or electron, decays first?
 
doggydan42 said:
to the diagram, it does not matter if the curve drawn for the W boson is further left at the vertex with the electron, being that time increases to the right?

The diagram does not tell you where in spacetime the two vertexes are; the fact that it seems to when you draw it is misleading. In the actual math, this diagram corresponds to an infinite number of terms, one for each possible pair of spacetime locations for the vertexes.
 
PeterDonis said:
The diagram does not tell you where in spacetime the two vertexes are; the fact that it seems to when you draw it is misleading. In the actual math, this diagram corresponds to an infinite number of terms, one for each possible pair of spacetime locations for the vertexes.

Okay, thank you very much.