edward
- 62
- 167
tribdog said:Screw you all. I USED to have favorites. Yep, sure did, used to.
Yea, me too and this whole thread is a little too touchy feely for me

tribdog said:Screw you all. I USED to have favorites. Yep, sure did, used to.
tribdog said:Screw you all. I USED to have favorites. Yep, sure did, used to.
TheStatutoryApe said:I thought you were your favourite member.
binzing said:Or do we?
binzing said:Meh, the bitter aftertaste got me.
Borek said:Honestly, that was my first idea - it will be much easier to tell whom I dislike. I even thought about starting a twin thread![]()
Ivan Seeking said:All of my favorites can be found in my friends list.
LightbulbSun said:List your favorite PFers and state a reason why they're your favorite.
1. Russ Watters: The guy knows his stuff and he runs a good website.
2. Astronuc: I like his positive outlooks on life. I also enjoy his humility and honesty.
3. Moonbear: I like reading her commentary on women. I've learned a lot about some of the subtle stuff.
4. Turbo: Two words: HOT STUFF!
5. Jason Rox: He has some rational perspectives on the nature of relationships. I wish he'd write a book about it.
marlon said:my favourite & favorite pfer is MARLON
aside that, this is a dumb thread
MARLON
LightbulbSun said:Why do you think this is a dumb thread?
LightbulbSun said:Why do you think this is a dumb thread?
marlon said:2) you never defined which criteria we should use to define "favourite"
3) after having defined those criteria, you should have weighted each and every one of them
4) you should explain how you weighted those and ask everybody's approval
5) you are forcing people to make biased choices based upon ... yeah, upon what ?
marlon said:Very good question, the best you have asked so far.
Let me explain...This is a dumb thread because -->
1) what's the point in knowing ones favourite pfer ? Really, c'mon...
2) you never defined which criteria we should use to define "favourite"
3) after having defined those criteria, you should have weighted each and every one of them
4) you should explain how you weighted those and ask everybody's approval
5) you are forcing people to make biased choices based upon ... yeah, upon what ?
6) you never explained WHY you want to know this, to what purpose ?
This is a dumb thread, mainly because of reasons 2, 3.
ciao
marlon
I thought those were the best threads.Howers said:I'm pretty sure this thread failed as it contains nothing but spam![]()
Borek said:Criteria for liking/disliking someone are always subjective, not objective. Trying to make them objective is... well, dumb?
Math Is Hard said:I want to know who Matt Damon's favorite PFers are.
Borek said:Criteria for liking/disliking someone are always subjective, not objective. Trying to make them objective is... well, dumb?
marlon said:Are you calling me dumb, Borek ?
Borek said:Who, me?![]()
Math Is Hard said:I want to know who Matt Damon's favorite PFers are.
That's exactly why I always wanted to meet you. There is no way you are real. Did you pass the Turing test lately ?marlon said:i think this is one of those effects that the internet has over those lovely people in real life
humanino said:Did you pass the Turing test lately ?