Who are the top 10 Nobel Prize-winning physicists?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ernest S Walton
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the subjective criteria for ranking Nobel Prize-winning physicists, with participants sharing their personal top ten lists and questioning the basis for such rankings. The scope includes conceptual exploration of what defines a "top" physicist.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant lists their top ten Nobel Prize-winning physicists, including Einstein, Heisenberg, and Feynman.
  • Another participant suggests adding Ernest Rutherford to the list, noting his contributions to physics despite winning a Nobel Prize in chemistry.
  • A participant questions the criteria used to determine the "top 10" physicists, implying that the selection may be arbitrary without clear standards.
  • Further comments express skepticism about the validity of the original list and the reasoning behind it, highlighting the need for defined criteria in such rankings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach consensus on the criteria for ranking physicists, with multiple views expressed regarding who should be included and the basis for selection.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the subjective nature of ranking scientists and the lack of agreed-upon criteria for such evaluations.

Ernest S Walton
Messages
31
Reaction score
10
So there are now exactly 200 Nobel prize-winning physicists...

Here is my top 10 -

Einstein
Heisenberg
N Bohr
Planck
Schrödinger
Fermi
Feynman
Dirac
Lorentz
Pauli
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might want to add Ernest Rutherford. Although he won for chemistry/"stamp collecting", his work was in physics.

AM
 
Ernest S Walton said:
So there are now exactly 200 Nobel prize-winning physicists...

Here is my top 10 -

Einstein
Heisenberg
N Bohr
Planck
Schrödinger
Fermi
Feynman
Dirac
Lorentz
Pauli

What characteristics actually qualified them to be in your "top 10"? The size of their noses? The length of their hair? Or how adorable they were?

Zz.
 
Andrew Mason said:
You might want to add Ernest Rutherford. Although he won for chemistry/"stamp collecting", his work was in physics.

AM

Yes indeed, and it was also difficult to leave out Born, Gell-Mann, Bardeen among others.

ZapperZ said:
What characteristics actually qualified them to be in your "top 10"? The size of their noses? The length of their hair? Or how adorable they were?

Zz.

I hope your other 30,532 posts are not quite so imbecilic.
 
Ernest S Walton said:
I hope your other 30,532 posts are not quite so imbecilic.

No, some of them were worse. It depends on the level of the topic. I'm very adaptable.

So you did not think my question was even with answering?

We have had many people asking for "best physicist" etc., and the issue had always been what CRITERIA does one use to decide or judge such a thing. It seems that the list you made appear to be rather arbitrary if you do not include how you decide who to include.

So was it?

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc and dlgoff

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K