Discussion Overview
The discussion centers around identifying the top engineers across various disciplines, including mechanical, aeronautical, electrical, and others. Participants explore historical figures and contemporary engineers, debating their contributions and significance within their fields.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
Main Points Raised
- Some participants propose Burt Rutan as a notable engineer for his work with SpaceShipOne and other aircraft, while others question his engineering credentials, suggesting he is more of a designer.
- Historical figures such as Robert H. Goddard, Sergei Korolev, Wernher von Braun, Rudolph Diesel, and Nikola Tesla are mentioned as significant contributors to engineering, with varying opinions on their ranking.
- Kelly Johnson and Jack Northrup are suggested as influential figures in aeronautical engineering, with some participants emphasizing the complexity of modern engineering requiring teamwork.
- Keith Duckworth is highlighted in automotive engineering for his design of the Cosworth DFV engine, praised for its long-lasting impact in racing.
- Some participants express uncertainty about how to define "best" engineers, noting the importance of context, specialization, and criteria for evaluation.
- There is mention of other historical figures like Isambard Kingdom Brunel, Joseph Whitworth, and Michael Faraday, with varying degrees of support for their inclusion in the discussion.
- Some participants argue that the question requires further qualification regarding engineering disciplines and specialties.
- Disagreement exists over whether figures like Leonardo da Vinci should be considered engineers, with some asserting his contributions span multiple fields.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on who the top engineers are, with multiple competing views and significant disagreement on criteria and definitions of "best." The discussion remains unresolved with various opinions presented.
Contextual Notes
Participants note the complexity of modern engineering and the collaborative nature of engineering projects, which complicates the attribution of individual contributions. There are also discussions about the historical context and the evolution of engineering disciplines.
Who May Find This Useful
Readers interested in engineering history, contributions of notable engineers, and the debate over criteria for evaluating engineering excellence may find this discussion informative.