Fiasal teslla
- 2
- 0
For a falling object, who can find the time in terms of the velocity for this journey( before reaching terminal velocity) with considering the resistive force?
The discussion centers around determining the time it takes for a falling object to reach terminal velocity while considering resistive forces. Participants explore the dynamics involved in setting up the equations of motion, particularly focusing on the role of different forms of resistive forces.
Participants express differing views on the appropriate form of the resistive force and its implications for the equations of motion. There is no consensus on the best approach to model the resistive force or the terminology used in the discussion.
Participants mention various forms of resistive forces, including linear and quadratic dependencies on velocity, but do not resolve which model is most appropriate for the scenario described. The discussion also highlights the importance of correctly applying signs in the equations.
When I tried to solve it, I started with this equationHallsofIvy said:I can"! But are you clear on the terminology? Your title asked "how can differentiate this one" implying you have a function to differentiate but that doesn't appear to be the case. You are just asking about setting up the dynamic equation.
As g edgar says, "Force equals mass times acceleration" so ma= m dv/dt= -g- f(v) where "f(v)" is the resistive force. That can be a very complicated function of the velocity depending on the situation. I do not agree with g edgar's "inverse" formulas. Typically, the faster something is going, the greater the drag, not the other way around. Normally, the drag is simplified to either -kv or -kv2 where k is the constant of proportionallity and v is the speed.