Who knows this formula and its solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rovelli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a formula presented in a book by Lauren Child, with participants questioning its validity and the presence of an equality sign. The scope includes conceptual clarification and technical reasoning regarding the structure of the formula.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants point out mismatching brackets in the formula and express doubt about its overall definition.
  • One participant claims to have identified the source of the equation and humorously suggests that the solution is 42, referencing the author Lauren Child and her collaboration with a mathematics professor.
  • Several participants question the absence of an equality sign in the formula, comparing it to a simpler problem (3+5) to emphasize the issue.
  • Another participant reiterates that the expression presented is not an equation due to the lack of an equality sign.
  • One participant mentions that the value of the expression might be 42 but notes that they have not confirmed this independently.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the formula lacks an equality sign and has structural issues, but there is no consensus on the validity of the expression or the proposed solution.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the completeness of the formula, particularly concerning the missing equality sign and the implications of the identified source.

rovelli
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
IMAG0082.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Mismatching brackets in the last sum. And I doubt the overall expression is well-defined.
Simply open the door and work from there without entering the room? ;)
 
mfb said:
Mismatching brackets in the last sum. And I doubt the overall expression is well-defined.
Simply open the door and work from there without entering the room? ;)

yes, one bracket is missing. I found out where the equation is from, it is from a book by an author named Lauren Child, and using that information, I found out that the solution to the equation is 42. LOL! She cooperates with maths prof Marcus de Sautoy...
 
Where is the equality sign in 3+5 (a "slightly" easier problem of the same type)?
 
rovelli said:
yes, one bracket is missing. I found out where the equation is from
What you have in the image is NOT an equation. An equation has this symbol in it somewhere: =.
rovelli said:
, it is from a book by an author named Lauren Child, and using that information, I found out that the solution to the equation is 42. LOL! She cooperates with maths prof Marcus de Sautoy...
That would be the value of the expression (I didn't confirm this for myself, though).
 
mfb said:
Where is the equality sign in 3+5 (a "slightly" easier problem of the same type)?

Here is the formula in original version, straight from the book by Lauren Child
IMAG0088.jpg
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K