rovelli
- 3
- 0
The discussion revolves around a formula presented in a book by Lauren Child, with participants questioning its validity and the presence of an equality sign. The scope includes conceptual clarification and technical reasoning regarding the structure of the formula.
Participants generally agree that the formula lacks an equality sign and has structural issues, but there is no consensus on the validity of the expression or the proposed solution.
There are unresolved questions regarding the completeness of the formula, particularly concerning the missing equality sign and the implications of the identified source.
mfb said:Mismatching brackets in the last sum. And I doubt the overall expression is well-defined.
Simply open the door and work from there without entering the room? ;)
What the h**l is this and where's the equality sign?rovelli said:
What you have in the image is NOT an equation. An equation has this symbol in it somewhere: =.rovelli said:yes, one bracket is missing. I found out where the equation is from
That would be the value of the expression (I didn't confirm this for myself, though).rovelli said:, it is from a book by an author named Lauren Child, and using that information, I found out that the solution to the equation is 42. LOL! She cooperates with maths prof Marcus de Sautoy...
mfb said:Where is the equality sign in 3+5 (a "slightly" easier problem of the same type)?