- 7,643
- 1,602
Against South Africa today, Tendulkar scored the first ODI double century.
The discussion centers around Sachin Tendulkar's achievement of scoring the first ODI double century against South Africa, exploring the significance of this milestone in cricket, the conditions under which it was achieved, and the implications for the sport.
Participants express a mix of admiration for Tendulkar's achievement and skepticism regarding the conditions that facilitated it. There is no clear consensus on the significance of the record or the validity of the statistics discussed.
Some participants note the limitations of using specific statistics to evaluate performance, particularly given the low number of games played at certain grounds, and the influence of ground conditions on scoring rates.
Readers interested in cricket statistics, the significance of sporting achievements, and the cultural impact of cricket may find this discussion engaging.
Jack21222 said:In English, please? I'm too lazy to start googling terms, but I'm interested enough to want to know more aobut this accomplishment.
The previous high score for a team batting at Gwalior was 289 (by Pak, vs SL in 1997).matt.o said:Geez! I saw he was 124 n.o after 33 overs and though SA might be in a bit of trouble! Mind you, I'm not sure 200 on the small, lightning fast Indian outfields would be 200 anywhere else.
hamster143 said:That basically means that someone named Tendulkar rode 200 miles non stop in a bicycle race. Not an easy task. Most humans only have enough energy stored in their muscles and liver to survive 50 to 75 miles. Beyond that, you have to rely on supplemental energy, maybe by eating an energy bar every 15 minutes.
http://www.ultracycling.com/training/prep_for_double_centuries.html
hamster143 said:That basically means that someone named Tendulkar rode 200 miles non stop in a bicycle race. Not an easy task. Most humans only have enough energy stored in their muscles and liver to survive 50 to 75 miles. Beyond that, you have to rely on supplemental energy, maybe by eating an energy bar every 15 minutes.
http://www.ultracycling.com/training/prep_for_double_centuries.html
The game is cricket. Here's a quickie intro:Jack21222 said:In English, please? I'm too lazy to start googling terms, but I'm interested enough to want to know more aobut this accomplishment.
Jack21222 said:In English, please? I'm too lazy to start googling terms, but I'm interested enough to want to know more aobut this accomplishment.
Gokul43201 said:The previous high score for a team batting at Gwalior was 289 (by Pak, vs SL in 1997).
http://stats.cricinfo.com/indvpak/e...nnings_totals.html?class=2;id=758;type=ground
Amar.alchemy said:If Cricket is a religion then Sachin is God and i am his ardent devotee :)
Agreed! Those are better ways to look at the stats.matt.o said:That's not a particularly good statistic to test my hypothesis, especially given the low number of games played at Gwalior. Perhaps a better way to look at this is by comparing the batting averages on a ground-by-ground basis for grounds where there have been > 10 ODIs:
http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=2;filter=advanced;orderby=team_average;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;template=results;type=aggregate;view=ground"
or given Tendulkar brought up his 200 in the last over, perhaps we should look at the above, but sorted by average run-rate:
http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=2;filter=advanced;orderby=runs_per_over;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;template=results;type=aggregate;view=ground"
Given the above, I will stand by my statement! (which included "In any case, it's a mean feat, so well done to the Little Master!")
Few would disagree with that. And speaking of Bradman ... http://www.cricinfo.com/india/content/story/96323.htmlYes, but this would have to be a polytheist religion which included the great Sir Donald Bradman!
matt.o said:That's not a particularly good statistic to test my hypothesis, especially given the low number of games played at Gwalior. Perhaps a better way to look at this is by comparing the batting averages on a ground-by-ground basis for grounds where there have been > 10 ODIs:
http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=2;filter=advanced;orderby=team_average;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;template=results;type=aggregate;view=ground"
In English, please?Doug Huffman said:In re cycling 'double century', 200 km or 120 miles is the shortest of the brevets to qualify for Paris-Brest-Paris or Boston-Montreal-Boston, 1200 km in 90 hours. Brevet, Audax or Randonee.
Doug Huffman said:In re cycling 'double century', 200 km or 120 miles is the shortest of the brevets to qualify for Paris-Brest-Paris or Boston-Montreal-Boston, 1200 km in 90 hours. Brevet, Audax or Randonee.
jobyts said:From the URL above, it looks like Indian grounds are in general favor of batsmen. Is it due to smaller ground, fast rolling ground or slow pitch?