News Who Should the Democrats choose in '08?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on who the Democrats should nominate for the 2008 presidential election, with a focus on appealing to both liberal and moderate voters. Participants debate the merits of various candidates, including Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Bill Richardson, highlighting the importance of strong messaging and the ability to connect with the electorate. There's a consensus that the Democrats need to choose someone who can attract voters disillusioned by John Kerry's campaign. The conversation also touches on the potential impact of a candidate's personality and background on their electability. Ultimately, the need for a meaningful platform that resonates with the American public is emphasized as crucial for success in the upcoming election.

Who should the Democrats choose in '08


  • Total voters
    18
  • #31
Locrian said:
You say they're changing. That's nice, but I'm not convinced, and I see no reason why anyone else should be.
You're right, maybe my rosy predictions of competent Politicians who change when they fail is too optimistic, and maybe my faith in the Democratic Party is misplaced. We'll see whether or not they've really learned anything in the next cycle of elections.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
If Obama ran I would vote for him in a heartbeat (though I doubt he will in 08 because he won't have finished one term yet). I don't think I'll ever forget watching him speak during the DNC last summer when all of a sudden it struck me that this man is going to run for president someday and, all things being equal, should win. I still stand by that statement wholeheartedly.
 
  • #33
Andromeda321 said:
If Obama ran I would vote for him in a heartbeat (though I doubt he will in 08 because he won't have finished one term yet). I don't think I'll ever forget watching him speak during the DNC last summer when all of a sudden it struck me that this man is going to run for president someday and, all things being equal, should win. I still stand by that statement wholeheartedly.

Interesting how the First Lady is an important factor to Americans. Theresa was a liability for Kerry, while Laura has been a tremendous help to Bush. I've only seen a little of Obama's wife (sorry I don't know her name), but it struck me that she is a strong, independent woman the way Hillary was, and traditional Americans don't like that. I can guess traditional white males in the South won't like anything about it--sad but true. Let's just hope our country can progress in the years to come, and not keep slipping backward.

As for recovery of the Democrats, I feel they have already shown improvement. With regard to Social Security, they have been pretty united and have not only created healthy debate, but have taken initiative with the calculator, etc. If they can keep taking initiative (presenting their own plans, etc.) and not just being reactionary, especially in reference to matters that Bush has ignored (economy, environment/global warming, etc.), they can recover. They do need to get their base together via better grass-roots methods--you know, those people who forgot to vote because they were hiking, enjoying the arts, counting whales, etc.--goofy liberals.

So did we settle on Biden then? :smile:
 
  • #34
Just saw this:

The Hearst Newspapers / Siena College National Poll: Do You Think the United States is Ready for a Woman President in 2008? - 62% say 'Yes" - Released 2/22/205
 
  • #35
A closer look at the Hearst Newspaper/Siena College Poll shows 81% would vote for a woman for president, but:
53% say Hillary Clinton should run
42% say Condi Rice should run

The poll also included Barbara Boxer and Elizabeth Dole in the survey. However, of those who feel a woman should run, only 18% expect a woman to be on the Republican ticket for president, while 60% expect a woman to be on the Democratic ticket.

I voted for Evan Bayh - By far he has the best chance of beating Hillary. And he is everything Hillary is not: highly elect-able.
 
  • #36
I like Bayh (sounds good, doesn't it?) for two reasons. One, he was a successful Governer of a state with both farms and heavy industry, something no other recent dem candidate can match, and two, because my late wife baby sat him when she was in college.
 
  • #37
woah, can i have your signature if he becomes the president? a humble request..
 
  • #38
selfAdjoint said:
I like Bayh (sounds good, doesn't it?) for two reasons. One, he was a successful Governer of a state with both farms and heavy industry, something no other recent dem candidate can match, and two, because my late wife baby sat him when she was in college.
Can any CANDIDATE in general even be said to have been a SUCESSFUL governor? Clinton and Bush were both pretty big failures as far as governorship goes (we went from 49th to 48th, hurray!).
 
  • #39
The games are on! In a recent address to a Japanese audience, Bill Clinton endorsed Hillary (imagine that). And though I do not watch FOX News, I saw this on a pro-Bush site:

Friday, March 4, 2005 8:55 a.m. EST
McCain: Hillary Won't Be President
Prospective 2008 presidential candidate Sen. John McCain said Tuesday that he doubts Hillary Clinton can win enough votes nationwide to reclaim the White House in the next presidential race.

"I don't believe that Senator Clinton will be president of the United States," McCain told the Fox News Channel's "Hannity & Colmes."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
12K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
8K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
7K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K