Who was Sponsian? Roman Emperor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A gold coin inscribed with the name and portrait of Sponsian, previously dismissed as a forgery, has been validated by recent scientific research, revealing it was in circulation around 2,000 years ago. This finding challenges long-held beliefs about Sponsian, who is now considered a real historical figure, likely a military commander who declared himself emperor during a tumultuous period in Dacia, a remote province of the Roman Empire. The coin, discovered in Transylvania over 300 years ago, was initially thought to be genuine until experts deemed it a fake due to its crude design. However, microscopic analysis showed evidence of wear consistent with circulation, indicating its authenticity. Researchers suggest Sponsian played a crucial role in maintaining order during a time of chaos and fragmentation in the empire, particularly around 260 AD. The study highlights the complexities of historical interpretation and the potential for new evidence to reshape our understanding of the past.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,340
Reaction score
7,138

Gold coin proves 'fake' Roman emperor was real or When experts are wrong.​

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-63636641

The coin bearing the name of Sponsian and his portrait was found more than 300 years ago in Transylvania, once a far-flung outpost of the Roman empire.
Believed to be a fake, it had been locked away in a museum cupboard.
Now scientists say scratch marks visible under a microscope prove that it was in circulation 2,000 years ago.
Prof Paul Pearson University College London, who led the research, told BBC News that he was astonished by the discovery.
"What we have found is an emperor. He was a figure thought to have been a fake and written off by the experts," he said.

"But we think he was real and that he had a role in history."

The coin at the centre of the story was among a small hoard discovered in 1713. It was thought to have been a genuine Roman coin until the mid-19th century, when experts suspected that they might have been produced by forgers of the time, because of their crude design.

The researchers believe that he was a military commander who was forced to crown himself as emperor of the most distant and difficult to defend province of the Roman empire, called Dacia.
Archaeological studies have established that Dacia was cut off from the rest of the Roman empire in around 260 AD. There was a pandemic, civil war and the empire was fragmenting.
Surrounded by enemies and cut off from Rome, Sponsian likely assumed supreme command during a period of chaos and civil war, protecting the military and civilian population of Dacia until order was restored, and the province evacuated between 271 AD and 275 AD, according to Jesper Ericsson.

When I was in Bulgaria many years ago, I hiked some of the 'Royal Road' between Rome and Byzantium/Constantinople, and I visited some of the monasteries. I cannot find an official name of the route. It based through Bulgaria into Romania then through Serbia and Slovena into Italy. I was informed that it was a route for emperors (or their embassies), popes (or representatives) and pilgrims between the two major centers. I'm not sure of the history though.

I found a different 'Royal Road' or 'Imperial Road' through Greece to Byzantium, Via Egnatia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Via_Egnatia
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Klystron and bob012345
Science news on Phys.org
Emperor for a day? Do they know how long he was in power?
 
bob012345 said:
Do they know how long he was in power?
I think that's questionable. What is known is that the coins are not modern. (The article states they pre-date Sponsianus by about 250 years, but I think this is just being sloppy). The coins have been around for about 200 years, and that is the only evidence.

The paper points out:
  • The coin's gold content is atypically low
  • The coin's manufacturing technique is atypical for the era
  • Contemporaneous counterfeits used different materials and techniques
  • Soil contamination indicates that thee coins were buried for a long but undetmined time.
The paper goes on to speculate - and I think this is a weak point - that Sponsianus was a historical figure, I guess today we'd call him a warlord, who never ruled Rome itself. The part about not ruling Rome is not in doubt; at that time, nobody really rules Rome until Diocletian around 300.
 
“The Roman Empire from Severus to Constantine“ by Southern is a good book about the Crisis of the Third Century.
 
Astronuc said:
When I was in Bulgaria many years ago, I hiked some of the 'Royal Road' between Rome and Byzantium/Constantinople, and I visited some of the monestaries. I cannot find an official name of the route. It based through Bulgaria into Romania then through Serbia and Slovena into Italy. I was informed that it was a route for emperors (or their embassies), popes (or representatives) and pilgrims between the two major centers. I'm not sure of the history though.
Via Militaris?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Via_Militaris
 
Frabjous said:
Yes, I believe that is the route. It passes through modern Plovdiv (then Philippopolis), and that was one of the towns I passed through to and from the mountains and a nearby monastery (Bachkovo Monastery "Uspenie Bogorodichno" Бачковски манастир „Успение Богородично“).
 
Last edited:
Historian seeks recognition for first English king https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9d07w50e15o Somewhere I have a list of Anglo-Saxon, Wessex and English kings. Well there is nothing new there. Parts of Britain experienced tribal rivalries/conflicts as well as invasions by the Romans, Vikings/Norsemen, Angles, Saxons and Jutes, then Normans, and various monarchs/emperors declared war on other monarchs/emperors. Seems that behavior has not ceased.

Similar threads

Back
Top