Who was Sponsian? Roman Emperor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the historical figure of Sponsian, a purported Roman emperor, and the implications of a gold coin bearing his name and portrait. Participants explore the authenticity of the coin, its historical context, and the significance of Sponsian's potential role during a tumultuous period in the Roman Empire, particularly in relation to the Crisis of the Third Century.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants highlight that the coin was believed to be a fake for centuries until recent research suggested it may have been in circulation 2,000 years ago.
  • There is speculation that Sponsian was a military commander who declared himself emperor in Dacia during a chaotic period, though the exact duration of his rule remains unclear.
  • Concerns are raised about the evidence supporting Sponsian's existence, with some participants questioning the reliability of the coin's dating and manufacturing techniques.
  • One participant notes that the coin's gold content and manufacturing methods are atypical for the era, suggesting possible counterfeiting.
  • Another participant references a book on the Crisis of the Third Century, indicating interest in the broader historical context of the discussion.
  • There are discussions about historical routes, such as the 'Royal Road' and 'Via Militaris,' with participants sharing personal experiences and seeking clarification on their historical significance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the authenticity of the coin and the historical validity of Sponsian as an emperor. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of Sponsian's rule and the implications of the coin's findings.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include uncertainties about the dating of the coin, the implications of its manufacturing techniques, and the historical context of Sponsian's potential rule. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of archaeological evidence.

Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
22,514
Reaction score
7,454

Gold coin proves 'fake' Roman emperor was real or When experts are wrong.​

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-63636641

The coin bearing the name of Sponsian and his portrait was found more than 300 years ago in Transylvania, once a far-flung outpost of the Roman empire.
Believed to be a fake, it had been locked away in a museum cupboard.
Now scientists say scratch marks visible under a microscope prove that it was in circulation 2,000 years ago.
Prof Paul Pearson University College London, who led the research, told BBC News that he was astonished by the discovery.
"What we have found is an emperor. He was a figure thought to have been a fake and written off by the experts," he said.

"But we think he was real and that he had a role in history."

The coin at the centre of the story was among a small hoard discovered in 1713. It was thought to have been a genuine Roman coin until the mid-19th century, when experts suspected that they might have been produced by forgers of the time, because of their crude design.

The researchers believe that he was a military commander who was forced to crown himself as emperor of the most distant and difficult to defend province of the Roman empire, called Dacia.
Archaeological studies have established that Dacia was cut off from the rest of the Roman empire in around 260 AD. There was a pandemic, civil war and the empire was fragmenting.
Surrounded by enemies and cut off from Rome, Sponsian likely assumed supreme command during a period of chaos and civil war, protecting the military and civilian population of Dacia until order was restored, and the province evacuated between 271 AD and 275 AD, according to Jesper Ericsson.

When I was in Bulgaria many years ago, I hiked some of the 'Royal Road' between Rome and Byzantium/Constantinople, and I visited some of the monasteries. I cannot find an official name of the route. It based through Bulgaria into Romania then through Serbia and Slovena into Italy. I was informed that it was a route for emperors (or their embassies), popes (or representatives) and pilgrims between the two major centers. I'm not sure of the history though.

I found a different 'Royal Road' or 'Imperial Road' through Greece to Byzantium, Via Egnatia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Via_Egnatia
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and bob012345
Science news on Phys.org
Emperor for a day? Do they know how long he was in power?
 
bob012345 said:
Do they know how long he was in power?
I think that's questionable. What is known is that the coins are not modern. (The article states they pre-date Sponsianus by about 250 years, but I think this is just being sloppy). The coins have been around for about 200 years, and that is the only evidence.

The paper points out:
  • The coin's gold content is atypically low
  • The coin's manufacturing technique is atypical for the era
  • Contemporaneous counterfeits used different materials and techniques
  • Soil contamination indicates that thee coins were buried for a long but undetmined time.
The paper goes on to speculate - and I think this is a weak point - that Sponsianus was a historical figure, I guess today we'd call him a warlord, who never ruled Rome itself. The part about not ruling Rome is not in doubt; at that time, nobody really rules Rome until Diocletian around 300.
 
“The Roman Empire from Severus to Constantine“ by Southern is a good book about the Crisis of the Third Century.
 
Astronuc said:
When I was in Bulgaria many years ago, I hiked some of the 'Royal Road' between Rome and Byzantium/Constantinople, and I visited some of the monestaries. I cannot find an official name of the route. It based through Bulgaria into Romania then through Serbia and Slovena into Italy. I was informed that it was a route for emperors (or their embassies), popes (or representatives) and pilgrims between the two major centers. I'm not sure of the history though.
Via Militaris?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Via_Militaris
 
Frabjous said:
Yes, I believe that is the route. It passes through modern Plovdiv (then Philippopolis), and that was one of the towns I passed through to and from the mountains and a nearby monastery (Bachkovo Monastery "Uspenie Bogorodichno" Бачковски манастир „Успение Богородично“).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
47
Views
12K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K