A recent discovery in Iraq confirmed the presence of chemical weapons, specifically a 155-millimeter artillery round containing sarin nerve agent, which exploded near a U.S. military convoy. This incident, reported by Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt, marks the second chemical weapon found, following the earlier discovery of mustard gas. Both weapons are believed to date back to the regime of Saddam Hussein, who failed to account for significant stockpiles of such munitions. The findings raise concerns about the potential resurgence of chemical attacks against U.S. forces in Iraq.
PREREQUISITESMilitary analysts, historians studying chemical warfare, policymakers involved in defense strategies, and anyone interested in the implications of chemical weapons in modern conflicts.
Simon666 said:Since he obviously is just a kid who doesn't know what he's talking about ...(.
Gokul43201 said:Tassel,
You are a true believer in your president. You and studentx. Such people are hard to find, given the wealth of evidence that Bush 2 has repeatedly lied to his people (see aluminum tubes, chemical vans, budget for medicare bill, why members of bin Laden family were flown out of country without FBI interrogation, how I saved the environment, how I served my National Guard term and "worked it out" with the military to be discharged early, etc. )
Perhaps you should work on his campaign...he can use some staunch support.
An anti-Bush opinion never killed anyone. Generally it's bullets doing that, and bombs, a great many of them made in America.studentx said:Half the damage (if not more) of this war is caused by this attitude.