The discussion centers around the recent discovery of chemical weapons, specifically sarin and mustard gas, in Iraq, following a roadside bomb incident involving U.S. military forces. The conversation explores the implications of these findings, the credibility of the U.S. government's claims, and the historical context of Iraq's chemical weapons program.
Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the credibility of the U.S. government's claims about the chemical weapons. While some accept the findings as significant, others question the motives behind the announcements, indicating a lack of consensus on the issue.
The discussion reflects varying levels of trust in governmental sources and the historical context of Iraq's chemical weapons program, with no clear resolution on the implications of the discoveries or the reliability of the information provided.
Simon666 said:Since he obviously is just a kid who doesn't know what he's talking about ...(.
Gokul43201 said:Tassel,
You are a true believer in your president. You and studentx. Such people are hard to find, given the wealth of evidence that Bush 2 has repeatedly lied to his people (see aluminum tubes, chemical vans, budget for medicare bill, why members of bin Laden family were flown out of country without FBI interrogation, how I saved the environment, how I served my National Guard term and "worked it out" with the military to be discharged early, etc. )
Perhaps you should work on his campaign...he can use some staunch support.
An anti-Bush opinion never killed anyone. Generally it's bullets doing that, and bombs, a great many of them made in America.studentx said:Half the damage (if not more) of this war is caused by this attitude.