Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Why adj( U(t)) * U(t) = I where U(t) is a propagator in QM?

  1. Jul 19, 2007 #1
    This is probably really obvious but can someone explain to me why adjiont( U(t)) * U(t) = I where U(t) is a propagator in QM and I is the identity.
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 20, 2007 #2
    Isn't that basically the definition of U?
  4. Jul 20, 2007 #3
    Look at what happens if you time-reverse the Schrödinger equation.
  5. Jul 20, 2007 #4
    This is not obvious, but can be proven. The time evolution operator U(t) [also known as propagator] must preserve probabilities. E. P. Wigner proved (I think it was in 1931) that this implies that U(t) is a unitary operator (formally, U(t) can be also antiunitary, but this possibility can be discarded on the basis of continuity of U(t)). This result is called "Wigner theorem". The condition you wrote is equivalent to saying that U(t) is a unitary operator.

  6. Jul 20, 2007 #5
    in the language of operator theory, i believe another proof is via Stone's theorem.

    it is always a bit startling to realize that many of the properties of QM follow very naturally from the mathematical properties of the Hilbert space. for example, many people are (for some reason) surprised when i tell them that the resolution of the identity, or complete set of states, [tex]\sum_i |i><i| = 1[/tex] is merely a trivial result of vector calculus, e.g. [tex]\vec{v} = \sum_i \vec{e_i} (\vec{e_i} \cdot \vec{v}) [/tex] with an arbitrary basis
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook