skilgannonau
- 8
- 0
snoopies622 said:Oh, I know. I just said that what you said reminded me of it.
Ok, I get it now. You meant 'fiction' literally as opposed to metaphorically. Cheers.
The recent U.S. government economic data release for November revealed a net job increase of only 39,000, which surprised many economists who had predicted a much higher figure of around 175,000. This discrepancy highlights the limitations of economic forecasting models, as many economists rely on educated guesses rather than precise predictions. The discussion emphasizes the need for transparency regarding the models used in these predictions and suggests that media reports should clarify that economists' expectations often differ from actual outcomes. The concept of the "replacement rate," approximately 130,000 new jobs per month, is crucial for understanding job growth dynamics.
PREREQUISITESEconomists, financial analysts, policymakers, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of economic forecasting and the factors influencing job market predictions.
snoopies622 said:Oh, I know. I just said that what you said reminded me of it.
snoopies622 said:No. And yet in principle one should be able to apply the scientific method to it, by isolating variables and looking for correlations. Maybe it just needs another few hundred years.
skilgannonau said:...I've stated this in another post, but unless you a see fundamental breakthrough in economics, economics isn't going to have the same predictive power as there is in physics (or even weather science). At best you're going to have approximations.