skilgannonau
- 8
- 0
snoopies622 said:Oh, I know. I just said that what you said reminded me of it.
Ok, I get it now. You meant 'fiction' literally as opposed to metaphorically. Cheers.
The discussion revolves around the frequent discrepancies between economists' predictions and actual government economic data releases, particularly regarding job growth figures. Participants explore the reliability of economic forecasting, the methodologies used by economists, and the implications of these predictions in the context of media reporting.
Participants generally agree that there is a lack of clarity and precision in how economists communicate their predictions, but there is no consensus on the reliability of economic forecasting or the appropriateness of current methodologies.
Limitations in the discussion include the absence of specific economic models referenced by participants, the variability in predictions based on differing methodologies, and the influence of political beliefs on economic interpretations.
This discussion may be of interest to those studying economics, media reporting on economic data, or individuals curious about the complexities of economic forecasting and its implications.
snoopies622 said:Oh, I know. I just said that what you said reminded me of it.
snoopies622 said:No. And yet in principle one should be able to apply the scientific method to it, by isolating variables and looking for correlations. Maybe it just needs another few hundred years.
skilgannonau said:...I've stated this in another post, but unless you a see fundamental breakthrough in economics, economics isn't going to have the same predictive power as there is in physics (or even weather science). At best you're going to have approximations.