Why Are Events Perceived Differently Across Inertial Frames?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanicaK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the principles of Special Relativity, specifically addressing why events are perceived differently across inertial reference frames and the constancy of the speed of light.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants raise questions about the simultaneity of events in different inertial frames and seek clarification on the constancy of the speed of light. Some express confusion regarding the explanations provided in their reference materials.

Discussion Status

Several participants are engaging with the original poster's questions, offering insights into the foundational concepts of Special Relativity. There is an ongoing exploration of the topics, with some participants suggesting additional resources for better understanding.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes the lack of clear explanations in their textbook, which may be influencing their understanding of the concepts discussed. The conversation also touches on the availability of alternative resources for studying relativity.

DanicaK
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Why events are not simultaneous in every inertial reference frame?

and

Why is the speed of light constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can someone answer my questions, please?
 
Hi DanicaK! :smile:

These are elementary rules of Special Relativity.

Which book are you working from?

Which part do you not understand?
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi DanicaK! :smile:

These are elementary rules of Special Relativity.

Which book are you working from?

Which part do you not understand?

I know they are elementary rules in the special theory of relativity. Yes I asked such a stupid question about the speed of light. But in my book from Zambak publication there is not good explenation why are the events not stimultanous in every inertial reference frame.
 
DanicaK said:
… in my book from Zambak publication …

author? title? :smile:
 
Musa Baş, Halit Cokşun, Murat Baycan :D
 
Modern physics - title.
 
oh, is it in Turkish? :smile:

there's lots of free online books on relativity …

do a google search for "special relativity", then click on "Books" in the drop-down menu from "more" at the top of the google page :wink:
 
No one knows why the speed of light is a constant...but it seems experiments have confirmed Einstein's theory that is IS constant...and finite...

Try reading here for the relatiovity of simultaneity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_of_simultaneity

and be sure to read the LADDER PARADOX...

Things at different points in space, not colocated, are relative because only light is constant, distance and time are RELATIVE, that is, not fixed...so different observers in general do not agree on distances and times...Another way to interpret this is that while Newton saw the distance between Earth and the sun,say, as a fixed observable, relativity concludes that different observers will measure different distances...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K