Why Are Gravity Effects Neglected in Stokes Flow Analysis?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
Est120
Messages
54
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
find the appropiate Navier-Stokes equation in the low Re number limit
Relevant Equations
Navier Stokes equations
in the limit as Re→0 , we can neglect the material derivate of v ( Dv/Dt =0 ) but why in books they always make the gravity effects equal to 0?
i can't understand and no one really explains this stuff
1610820716854.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The density is being treated as constant, so the gravational force per unit mass is [itex]\mathbf{g} = -\nabla\left(-\int\mathbf{g} \cdot d\mathbf{x}\right)[/itex].

You can therefore absorb it into the pressure term. It makes no difference to the mathematics if you work with [itex]p[/itex] or [itex]p' = p - \int\mathbf{g} \cdot d\mathbf{x}[/itex].
 
pasmith said:
The density is being treated as constant, so the gravational force per unit mass is [itex]\mathbf{g} = -\nabla\left(-\int\mathbf{g} \cdot d\mathbf{x}\right)[/itex].

You can therefore absorb it into the pressure term. It makes no difference to the mathematics if you work with [itex]p[/itex] or [itex]p' = p - \int\mathbf{g} \cdot d\mathbf{x}[/itex].
yeah, that's the so called "modified pressure" right? i hardly managed to get that but still almost no source of information talks about that...